2018-03-19 0:07 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 5:38 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> Le 18 mars 2018 21:29, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a >> écrit : >> >> >> > On Mar 18, 2018, at 12:43 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > 1. code will be at geronimo - whatever happens at tomee >> >> As far as I understand the topic is still open and no git repos have been >> created anywhere yet, is that right? >> >> >> Yes >> >> >> Is there anyone on the Geronimo side who would be open to collaborating >> on a reusable JWT library under the TomEE project for a change? Something >> not branded tomee or geronimo. >> >> >> This is what was proposed to be created @g which is just an umbrella, no >> more a project delivery by itself. >> >> Are you against/-1ing g-jwt-auth? >> > > As mentioned elsewhere in the thread, I am against bringing something in > geronimo that is TomEE specific. I haven't looked at the code (as far as I > can tell, nothing is linked in this thread so I have no idea if code even > exists) but based on what I've seen with implementing JWT it's closely tied > to your container. So I don't believe its a good fit. > > Why is your preference to bring this into geronimo? >
As mentionned there is no link to TomEE in the jwt-auth codebase so no reason to hold that code in something not reusable at tomee. > > >> >> >> >> -David >> >> >>
