It also picks it up as 2 deplorable a... Mit autocorrect gesendet
> Am 09.06.2018 um 18:02 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > What is suspicious is that: > 1. was working well for years > 2. it is already isolated in tomee since we scan the deployable and not the > classpath for that reason > > maybe the default scanning of the container change? > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le sam. 9 juin 2018 à 16:20, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> a > écrit : > >> commenting out adding the persistence.xml to the arquillian test makes it >> pass: >> @Deployment >> public static WebArchive archive() { >> return new WebModule(SubjectServiceTomEETest.class).getArchive() >> .addClass(VoteCounter.class) >> .addPackage(Subject.class.getPackage()) // domain >> //X .addAsWebInfResource(new >> ClassLoaderAsset("META-INF/persistence.xml"), "persistence.xml") >> >> We had such problems in OpenWebBeans as well. There we opted to isolate >> the app away completely.That's one of the shortcomings of Arquilian in >> practice. It sadly makes a difference whether you run it embedded vs >> in-container vs remote-container :( >> LieGrue,strub >> >> On Saturday, 9 June 2018, 16:13:52 CEST, Mark Struberg >> <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID> wrote: >> >> It seems like one is coming from >> file:/tmp/arquillian-tomee-app-working-dir/0/SubjectServiceTomEETest/#pollingthe >> other from >> >> file:/home/struberg/.m2/repository/jug/polling-domain/1.1.0-SNAPSHOT/polling-domain-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar#polling >> >> >> As if it would be an Arquillian setup issue.I compared fb8 with master but >> could not find any differences though. >> LieGrue,strub >> On Saturday, 9 June 2018, 14:28:38 CEST, Romain Manni-Bucau < >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Can be a classloader change with a recent upgrade. >> >> Le sam. 9 juin 2018 13:23, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> a >> écrit : >> >>> >>> I get a duplicate unit exception in >>> jug.rest.arquillian.SubjectServiceTomEETest which is in polling-web.This >>> happens in the fb_tomee8 branch. >>> >>> 0 = {TreeMap$Entry@5654} >>> >> "file:/home/struberg/.m2/repository/jug/polling-domain/1.1.0-SNAPSHOT/polling-domain-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar#client1" >>> -> >>> 1 = {TreeMap$Entry@5655} >>> >> "file:/home/struberg/.m2/repository/jug/polling-domain/1.1.0-SNAPSHOT/polling-domain-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar#client2" >>> -> >>> 2 = {TreeMap$Entry@5656} >>> >> "file:/home/struberg/.m2/repository/jug/polling-domain/1.1.0-SNAPSHOT/polling-domain-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar#polling" >>> -> >>> 3 = {TreeMap$Entry@5657} >>> >> "file:/tmp/arquillian-tomee-app-working-dir/0/SubjectServiceTomEETest/#client1" >>> -> >>> 4 = {TreeMap$Entry@5658} >>> >> "file:/tmp/arquillian-tomee-app-working-dir/0/SubjectServiceTomEETest/#client2" >>> -> >>> 5 = {TreeMap$Entry@5659} >>> >> "file:/tmp/arquillian-tomee-app-working-dir/0/SubjectServiceTomEETest/#polling" >>> -> >>> >>> >>> Anyone has an idea why? >>> txs and LieGrue,strub >>>
