Thank you! I’ll have a look.
Cheers, Roberto > On 11 Oct 2018, at 09:47, Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Also tested one of our applications now. > The application itself is working fine BUT the startup time is much more as > in 7.0.4. > I started both 7.0.4 and 8.0.0.RC2 5 times: > 7.0.4 best startup: ~9seconds > 8.0.0RC2 best startup: ~14seconds > > both are tomee-plus. > > Is this epxected? > > > > Am Do., 11. Okt. 2018 um 10:27 Uhr schrieb Matthew Broadhead > <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk.invalid>: > >> i have rc2 working on my development machine Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS. it >> started first time and seems quite a bit snappier than 7.1.0 or maybe it >> is just my imagination... >> >> On 11/10/18 00:27, Roberto Cortez wrote: >>> I’ve deployed a new RC2-SNAPSHOT with the current master: >>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/tomee/apache-tomee/8.0.0-RC2-SNAPSHOT/ >> < >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/tomee/apache-tomee/8.0.0-RC2-SNAPSHOT/ >>> >>> >>> Also, here is the result of our latest builds: >>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8 < >> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8> >>> >>> Please, if you have the chance try it out. We hope to come up with the >> final binaries and the vote real soon. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Roberto >>> >>>> On 10 Oct 2018, at 14:32, Matthew Broadhead < >> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk.INVALID> wrote: >>>> >>>> great! thanks >>>> >>>> On 10/10/18 13:52, Roberto Cortez wrote: >>>>> Yes, already merged it. >>>>> >>>>>> On 10 Oct 2018, at 07:59, Matthew Broadhead < >> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk.INVALID> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> is MyFaces update making it into the release? >>>>>> >>>>>> On 09/10/18 22:04, Roberto Cortez wrote: >>>>>>> Excellent! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I can prepare a RC2-SNAPSHOT for quick testing while we prepare for >> the actual release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We have a MyFaces update pending. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does anyone object if we move forward with the current state of the >> code? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Roberto >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 9 Oct 2018, at 19:54, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, thks Roberto. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Le mar. 9 oct. 2018 20:44, Roberto Cortez >> <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid> a >>>>>>>> écrit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is this what you had in mind? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >> https://github.com/apache/tomee/commit/795fa40bc76581a1a923805527a780e02c9bf91f >>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>> >> https://github.com/apache/tomee/commit/795fa40bc76581a1a923805527a780e02c9bf91f >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> Roberto >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 9 Oct 2018, at 05:20, Romain Manni-Bucau < >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Le mar. 9 oct. 2018 01:56, Roberto Cortez >> <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid> >>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>> écrit : >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Romain, you mean here: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >> https://github.com/radcortez/tomee/blob/426e0c14fede5ee5907e43e1c46e2fd51c904412/tomee/tomee-catalina/src/main/java/org/apache/tomee/catalina/TomcatWebAppBuilder.java#L1772-L1774 >>>>>>>>> ? >>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >> https://github.com/radcortez/tomee/blob/426e0c14fede5ee5907e43e1c46e2fd51c904412/tomee/tomee-catalina/src/main/java/org/apache/tomee/catalina/TomcatWebAppBuilder.java#L1772-L1774 >>>>>>>>>>> ?> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Well, why hope there is a single one? :) In case of EAR, >> shouldn’t all >>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>> them be started? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yes but not here. But this code is fragile and relies on the fact >> it is >>>>>>>>>> already started and this line skipped. This method is "start one >> webapp" >>>>>>>>> so >>>>>>>>>> we can just filter the one this lethod must start and skip >> others. Then >>>>>>>>>> your fix is hurtless if there is any deployment change, you dont >> use >>>>>>>>>> default deployment lifecycle and the codebase is more robust. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> David, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> After the RC release, we detected that issue with the MP binary >> and the >>>>>>>>>>> way some implementations are accessing the context. I did sent a >>>>>>>>> tentative >>>>>>>>>>> fix, that fixes that issue, but Romain things that it may cause >> others, >>>>>>>>> so >>>>>>>>>>> we are trying to figure out what tests are we missing or if the >> code >>>>>>>>> needs >>>>>>>>>>> to change. You can help reviewing it as well. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>> Roberto >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 8 Oct 2018, at 21:50, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com >>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> I shot a note out to bval asking of there's a chance of getting >> a >>>>>>>>>>> release this week. >>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming that's possible, is there anything standing in our way >> for >>>>>>>>>>> putting up a release vote ourselves this week? >>>>>>>>>>>> -David >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 8, 2018, at 8:28 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < >> rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> one option can be to start only one webapp here instead of all >> and >>>>>>>>> hope >>>>>>>>>>>>> there is a single one or others are skipped ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>> >> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le lun. 8 oct. 2018 à 16:15, Roberto Cortez >>>>>>>>> <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, thanks. Can you help to better test it? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roberto >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6 Oct 2018, at 08:26, Romain Manni-Bucau < >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le sam. 6 oct. 2018 00:30, Roberto Cortez >>>>>>>>> <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would something like this work? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >> https://github.com/apache/tomee/commit/ea13f63f21d7f06388e2c54d70120a5a98e4c65f >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >> https://github.com/apache/tomee/commit/ea13f63f21d7f06388e2c54d70120a5a98e4c65f >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’m not exactly sure what the problem might be with EAR. Web >>>>>>>>> Modules, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> seem >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to also be deployed like this, so they suffer from the same >> issue. >>>>>>>>>>> After >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the JAX-RS app is started the context is removed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You set a single context for all webapps so code is quite >> miskeading >>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> error prone. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know what other situations you have in mind >> that may >>>>>>>>>>> cause >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roberto >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4 Oct 2018, at 16:05, Roberto Cortez >>>>>>>>> <radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I understand. Was just trying to give more detail into it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’ll have a better look and try to come up with some test >>>>>>>>> scenarios. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4 Oct 2018, at 10:47, Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le jeu. 4 oct. 2018 à 11:42, Roberto Cortez >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well the exception being thrown is not the actual >> exception. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This was only happening in the MP binary due to the >> OpenAPI >>>>>>>>>>> Geronimo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation. In the DefaultLoader the ServletContext >> is >>>>>>>>>>> injected, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the time that the JAX-RS app is deployed, which is in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AfterApplicationCreated event, the ServletContextHandler >> does >>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Context anymore so it throws a >> IllegalStateException("Didnt >>>>>>>>> find a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> web >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context for " + contextClassLoader). The caller for this >> is the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setApplication of the OpenAPIFilter when we try to >> inject it, so >>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes the exception we see in the logs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We never say this in Arquillian testing, because >> Arquillian >>>>>>>>> waits >>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server to start and then deploys the app. This means we >> are able >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ServletContext from the request in >> ServletContextHandler, so it >>>>>>>>>>> works >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe this is also related with the fix you did here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-1687 < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-1687> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can be but at the end the two issues are mentionned are >> not >>>>>>>>>>> covered: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. a regression will silently come back >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. for ears we can leak the servlet context if we end up >> here >>>>>>>>> (and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> app will wrongly behave) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My point is not to revert what you did but more to ensure >> it >>>>>>>>> fixes >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue in our build. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roberto >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4 Oct 2018, at 08:23, Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Roberto: do we have a test to reproduce and prevent >> future >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regressions? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your fix is right the error message is quite unexpected >> so it >>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better to ensure we don't break it unintentionnally (a >> side >>>>>>>>> note >>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setting a single webapp context and firing an event for >> all >>>>>>>>>>> webapps >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have the same pitfall so it can need to be reworked to >> ensure >>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it for ears to not leak context between webapp which >> would be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> another >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nasty >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | >> Book >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>> >> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le jeu. 4 oct. 2018 à 01:43, Roberto Cortez >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Cesar, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I’ve found the issue. Just pushed a fix and now >>>>>>>>> waiting >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build bot to check if everything is ok. I’ll let you >> know when >>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roberto >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3 Oct 2018, at 22:50, Roberto Cortez >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure. Let me have a look. On Wednesday, >> October 3, >>>>>>>>> 2018, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8:56:13 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PM GMT+1, César Hernández Mendoza < >> cesargu...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a simple REST app that is working fine with >>>>>>>>>>> tomee.version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.1.0, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but tomee:run it's getting issues after updating it to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8.0.0-RC1-SNAPSHOT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and also update the javaee-api to 8.0-SNAPSHOT. mvn >> test runs >>>>>>>>>>> fine >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when I try to run mvn clean install tomee:run I got a >> cxf >>>>>>>>> error >>>>>>>>>>> (I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attached >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the full log file to this email). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 03-Oct-2018 11:54:26.368 SEVERE [main] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.utils.InjectionUtils.reportServerError >>>>>>>>>>> Method >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setApplication can not be accessed due to security >> manager >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restrictions03-Oct-2018 11:54:26.378 SEVERE [main] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >> org.apache.openejb.observer.ObserverManager$MethodInvocation.invoke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> error >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> invoking >>>>>>>>> org.apache.tomee.webservices.TomeeJaxRsService@7ea37dbf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any idea why this is happening with the RC1? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El mar., 2 oct. 2018 a las 14:04, Roberto Cortez >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (<radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid>) escribió: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Matthew, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feel free to try it. Yes, no planned changes, unless >>>>>>>>> something >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> required >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixing. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roberto >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Oct 2018, at 16:37, Matthew Broadhead < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk.INVALID> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should i try out the RC1 or wait for release >> candidate? i >>>>>>>>>>> guess >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will be the same unless something needs upgrading? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 02/10/18 12:18, Roberto Cortez wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess it would be ASAP :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So if anyone wants to have anything in, now its the >> time. >>>>>>>>>>> Speak >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> forever hold your peace :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roberto >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Oct 2018, at 00:16, David Blevins < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> david.blev...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome. If you have a date in mind for the first >> release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attempt, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definitely let people know so they can complete >> anything they >>>>>>>>>>> may >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get done. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Blevins >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 1, 2018, at 2:41 PM, Roberto Cortez >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi David, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do intent to keep pushing with the release. >> Just doing >>>>>>>>>>>>>> “this” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already had me going through some stuff, which Jon >> helped me >>>>>>>>>>> out. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So consider it a first step :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roberto >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1 Oct 2018, at 19:28, David Blevins < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> david.blev...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the spirit behind this is great. >> However, I >>>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually helps as the hardest part which will be for >> you to >>>>>>>>>>> learn >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process itself. Time wise you should budget 3 >> weeks. >>>>>>>>>>> When >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know what you're doing the process usually takes 2 >> weeks >>>>>>>>>>> minimum as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> almost always at least one aborted vote and reroll. >> Given >>>>>>>>> that, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chances of a release by CodeOne are already slim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My advice would be to create a release branch >> and start >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cutting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actual binaries in nexus. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Blevins >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 1, 2018, at 10:57 AM, Roberto Cortez >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Following up some of our recent emails, I did >> push a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> snapshot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version marked as RC of the upcoming TomEE 8 Release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, find the binaries here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/tomee/apache-tomee/8.0.0-RC1-SNAPSHOT/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/tomee/apache-tomee/8.0.0-RC1-SNAPSHOT/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And remember to add the following repository to >> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>> project: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>apache.snapshots.https</id> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>Apache Development Snapshot >> Repository</name> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </url> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It should be very close to the actual release. >> Please, >>>>>>>>>>> help >>>>>>>>>>>>>> up >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take it for a spin and try it out :) Thank you! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roberto >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Atentamente: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> César Hernández Mendoza. >>> >> >>
