That's why I was asking for the Java version and the version of TomEE
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com


On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:55 PM Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is it related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2271?
>
> Am Mo., 19. Nov. 2018 um 12:38 Uhr schrieb Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Thanks for providing that extra detail here. I did take a look at this
> one,
> > and I'm surprised we haven't run into it before. I'll pick up your PR and
> > review.
> >
> > Cheers!
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:33 AM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
> > osant...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry, a sent the first one as an accident.
> > >
> > > I’ve created a PR: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/200
> > >
> > > The error class happened at this class JaxbJavaee.java, because of this
> > > filter:
> > >
> > > final JavaeeNamespaceFilter xmlFilter = new
> > > JavaeeNamespaceFilter(parser.getXMLReader());
> > > xmlFilter.setContentHandler(unmarshaller.getUnmarshallerHandler());
> > >             // unmarshall
> > > source = new SAXSource(xmlFilter, new InputSource(in));
> > >
> > > Most precise, at this piece of code:
> > >
> > > super.startElement("http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee";, localName,
> > qname,
> > > atts);
> > >
> > > This is the code file to test: unmarshalling openejb-cmp-orm.xml
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/200/files#diff-78d8a62617e6ef5c7a0567ee4a62711e
> > > >
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/200/files#diff-78d8a62617e6ef5c7a0567ee4a62711e
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 8:44 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey Otavio
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for posting. At what point do you run into this exception
> (your
> > > > stacktrace shows the unmarshal, but not where its called from).  If
> you
> > > > have a PR, shoot a link here and I'll be happy to take a look.
> > > >
> > > > Jon
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:31 AM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
> > > > osant...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all.
> > > > >
> > > > > We found an error when using CMP; when the container starts, it
> > returns
> > > > an
> > > > > unmarshal error:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.unmarshaller.UnmarshallingContext.handleEvent(UnmarshallingContext.java:662)
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.unmarshaller.Loader.reportError(Loader.java:258)
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.unmarshaller.Loader.reportError(Loader.java:253)
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.unmarshaller.Loader.reportUnexpectedChildElement(Loader.java:120)
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.unmarshaller.Loader.childElement(Loader.java:105)
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.unmarshaller.StructureLoader.childElement(StructureLoader.java:262)
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.unmarshaller.UnmarshallingContext._startElement(UnmarshallingContext.java:498)
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.unmarshaller.UnmarshallingContext.startElement(UnmarshallingContext.java:480)
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.unmarshaller.SAXConnector.startElement(SAXConnector.java:150)
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > org.xml.sax.helpers.XMLFilterImpl.startElement(XMLFilterImpl.java:551)
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.openejb.jee.JaxbJavaee$JavaeeNamespaceFilter.startElement(JaxbJavaee.java:291)
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.startElement(AbstractSAXParser.java:509)
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanStartElement(XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.java:1359)
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl$FragmentContentDriver.next(XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.java:2784)
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentScannerImpl.next(XMLDocumentScannerImpl.java:602)
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanDocument(XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.java:505)
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(XML11Configuration.java:842)
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(XML11Configuration.java:771)
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XMLParser.parse(XMLParser.java:141)
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.parse(AbstractSAXParser.java:1213)
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.jaxp.SAXParserImpl$JAXPSAXParser.parse(SAXParserImpl.java:643)
> > > > >     at
> > org.xml.sax.helpers.XMLFilterImpl.parse(XMLFilterImpl.java:357)
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.unmarshaller.UnmarshallerImpl.unmarshal0(UnmarshallerImpl.java:258)
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.unmarshaller.UnmarshallerImpl.unmarshal(UnmarshallerImpl.java:236)
> > > > >     at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.unmarshaller.UnmarshallerImpl.unmarshal(UnmarshallerImpl.java:288)
> > > > >
> > > > > I found the error at the JavaeeNamespaceFilter that initially I try
> > to
> > > > use
> > > > > either Strategy or Strategy to do a bypass on this filter when is
> > CMP.
> > > > > However, with a not good result. So, I created a more
> straightforward
> > > > > solution that creates a new method that does not use this filter.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to