I've tried changing to that version as well, didn't work. If I run the command that broke the test:
"C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_161\jre\bin\java" -javaagent:C:\Users\Ferdi_S672\Documents\Personal\Projects\tomee\container\openejb-core\target\openejb-javaagent-8.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar -Dopenejb.classloader.forced-skip=org.apache.openejb.jee.,org.apache.openejb.api. -Dopenejb.classloader.forced-load=org.apache.openejb -enableassertions -Dopenejb.descriptors.output.folder=./dump/ -Dorg.apache.activemq.SERIALIZABLE_PACKAGES=org,java -jar C:\Users\FERDI_~1\AppData\Local\Temp\surefire4923413819281954940\surefirebooter7579699950053744316.jar C:\Users\Ferdi_S672\AppData\Local\Temp\surefire4923413819281954940 2018-11-27T15-00-14_583-jvmRun1 surefire7936970543296277600tmp surefire_04537004988640125092tmp I got this: # Created at 2018-11-27T15:08:14.729 System.exit() or native command error interrupted process checker. java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot use PPID 5228 process information. Going to use NOOP events. at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.PpidChecker.checkProcessInfo(PpidChecker.java:155) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.PpidChecker.isProcessAlive(PpidChecker.java:116) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter$2.run(ForkedBooter.java:214) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:308) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:294) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) On 11/26/2018 8:02 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: > Going to fire this off on a Linux and a Windows machine here to see a) if I > see the same thing, and b) see if I can give some pointers. I don't have > ideas right off the top of my head at the moment. Romain's suggestion is > definitely worth a try. > > For reference, we have a CI build here: > https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8 - it doesn't look > like we have the same issue there (we have different ones!) > > Thanks for trying this - and thanks for trying it on a Windows machine too, > its good to know whether it is or isn't working there. > > Jon > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 7:55 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Ferdi, >> >> surefire got some "hiccup" in last versions, maybe try 3.0.0-M1 or or >> 2.22.1 which should work, if not the output dump can help sometimes to >> identify if it is a memory issue or (more likely) another one. >>