Let's revive this discussion ... We are working on build stability (see other thread). I was digging into an issue where there is a mismatch between the API we pick in TomEE 8.x (master) which is for the moment MP 1.3 compliant.
Unfortunately we have upgraded CXF which is now rest-client 1.1 as opposed to 1.0 before. As a result, the TCK fails because of a NoSuchMethodException. So what do we target in terms of TomEE 8.x (master)? Do we stay MP 1.3 or MP 2.0 or else? Thoughts? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 11:24 PM Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > Good question. > > I think the community could help with the following topics: > > - Test the new MP dependencies in your projects. You can build the > project with PR (until is not merged) and try it out. > > - Contribute with additional tests outside the scope of the TCK. Might be > tricky, since you need to read both the TCK and Spec to figure out what is > missing. For instance, JWT spec mentions that "MicroProfile JWT > implementations are required to throw a `DeploymentException` if both > `mp.jwt.verify.publickey` and `mp.jwt.verify.publickey.location` are > supplied.” I believe the TCK doesn’t test this scenario. You need to go out > there to find them. > > - Contribute with samples showing a particular feature of MP. We don’t > have samples around OpenAPI or OpenTracing, so these are good candidates. > > - Help on Fault Tolerance implementation for 1.1. This should be our main > concern. Until this is done, we cannot rely say we are MP 2.0 compliant (or > 2.x for that matter). > > Cheers, > Roberto > > > On 4 Dec 2018, at 21:52, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > How can people help? > > > > > > -- > > David Blevins > > http://twitter.com/dblevins > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > >> On Dec 4, 2018, at 11:30 AM, Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> I’ve done some work on update our implementations for MP 2.0: > >> https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/212 < > https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/212> > >> > >> With our latest implementation of JWT 1.1, we are almost there. To be > compliant, we are only missing Fault Tolerance 1.1. There are some > discussions about that on the Geronimo list. You may want to have a look > into it as well. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Roberto > > > >
