Hi Doychin,

Safeguard is implemented under the Geronimo project umbrella, so if you need to 
report any issue, you need to report them in Geronimo JIRA:
https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO 
<https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO>

Here you can find some issues:
https://jira.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20GERONIMO%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22safeguard%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
 
<https://jira.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20=%20GERONIMO%20AND%20resolution%20=%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22safeguard%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20updated%20DESC>

Hope it helps!

Cheers,
Roberto

> On 7 Jan 2019, at 11:46, Doychin Bondzhev <doyc...@dsoft-bg.com> wrote:
> 
> Actually this version of safegurad is not behaving properly with some tests 
> which fail for different reasons. 
> 
> For example there is a bug in the implementation for jitter where if you 
> provide 0 as value it will fail.
> Another problem I've noticed is when you run the tests for fault tolerance 
> they fail because some embedded classes in safeguard are not recognized as 
> CDI beans and when and instance have to be injected during test run test 
> fails. 
> 
> If I add the these classes as part of the module and also add metrics API as 
> test dependency test passes.
> 
> That is why I asked where such problems can be reported back to safeguard 
> developers.
> I can't find anything in Jirra regarding safeguard.
> 
> On 7.1.2019 г. 13:16, Roberto Cortez [via TomEE & OpenEJB] wrote:
>> Yes, 
>> 
>> There is already a 1.1 Geronimo implementation compliant version 
>> (Safeguard). JL added it, but it was failing the TCK. We think we need to do 
>> some integration code to be able to use it properly. Bruno was going to do 
>> that, so we reverted back to 1.0 version so we can have a green build until 
>> we figure that out. 
>> 
>> Please check the following thread: 
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E
>>  
>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E>
>>  
>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E
>>  
>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E>>
>>  
>> 
>> Cheers, 
>> Roberto 
>> 
>> > On 6 Jan 2019, at 19:47, David Blevins <[hidden email] 
>> > <x-msg://59/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4687306&i=0>> wrote: 
>> > 
>> > Noticed we're using Fault Tolerance 1.0, whereas MicroProfile 2.0 has 
>> > Fault Tolerance 1.1. 
>> > 
>> > Is there a 1.1 implementation we can use? 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> > David Blevins 
>> > http://twitter.com/dblevins <http://twitter.com/dblevins>
>> > http://www.tomitribe.com <http://www.tomitribe.com/>
>> > 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion 
>> below:
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687306.html
>>  
>> <http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687306.html>
>> To start a new topic under TomEE Dev, email 
>> ml+s979440n982480...@n4.nabble.com 
>> <mailto:ml+s979440n982480...@n4.nabble.com> 
>> To unsubscribe from TomEE Dev, click here 
>> <http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=982480&code=ZG95Y2hpbkBkc29mdC1iZy5jb218OTgyNDgwfC0xNTI2MjM5MTA3>.
>> NAML 
>> <http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
> -- 
> Doychin Bondzhev
> dSoft-Bulgaria Ltd.
> PowerPro - billing & provisioning solution for Service providers
> http://www.dsoft-bg.com/ <http://www.dsoft-bg.com/>
> Mobile: +359888243116
> <doychin.vcf>

Reply via email to