I tried a workaround to ignore at CdiScanner, however, even if this code is
still loading the class.
if(!clazz.getName().equals("org.apache.geronimo.microprofile.openapi.cdi.GeronimoOpenAPIExtension"))
{
classes.add(clazz);
}
However, that still send the information to OpenWebBeans. My next step is
to try at the *OpenEJBLifecycle*.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 5:45 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
osant...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>
>
> I created the TomEEOpenAPIExtension that wrapper the
> GeronimoOpenAPIExtension.
>
> My question is, how can I shut down the GeronimoOpenAPIExtension
> extension?
>
> I tried to append this value at system.properties:
>
> openejb.classloader.forced-skip=org.apache.geronimo.microprofile.openapi.cdi
> But it does not work.
>
> I need to ignore the GeronimoOpenAPIExtension, to avoid the duplicated
> creation of Bean at CDI.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 9:52 AM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
> osant...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, this approach does not work.
>>
>>
>> ProxyFactory proxyFactory = new ProxyFactory();
>> proxyFactory.setSuperclass(Application.class);
>> proxyFactory.setFilter(new MethodFilter() {
>> public boolean isHandled(Method m) {
>> return !m.getName().equals("finalize");
>> }
>> });
>> Class aClass = proxyFactory.createClass();
>>
>> MethodHandler mi = new MethodHandler() {
>> public Object invoke(Object self, Method m, Method proceed,
>> Object[] args) throws Throwable {
>> //wrap the getClass()
>> return proceed.invoke(self, args);
>> }
>> };
>> Application foo = (Application)aClass.newInstance();
>> ((ProxyObject)foo).setHandler(mi);
>> Class<? extends Application> aClass1 = foo.getClass();
>>
>>
>> I'll try another strategy.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:39 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>> osant...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>
>>> One possible solution is the Javassist <http://www.javassist.org/>.
>>> Therefore, I can create a proxy on a class.
>>>
>>> ProxyFactory factory = new ProxyFactory();
>>> factory.setSuperclass(Application.class);
>>> factory.setFilter(
>>> new MethodFilter() {
>>> @Override
>>> public boolean isHandled(Method method) {
>>> return true;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> );
>>>
>>> MethodHandler handler = new MethodHandler() {
>>> @Override
>>> public Object invoke(Object self, Method thisMethod, Method proceed,
>>> Object[] args) throws Throwable {
>>> //the logic here
>>> }
>>> };
>>>
>>> Application application = (Application) factory.create(new Class<?>[0], new
>>> Object[0], handler);
>>>
>>>
>>> That is possible, but it does not look good. I'll try another option.
>>> Also, we need to include this library on the Server.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:45 AM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>>> osant...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The InternalApplication is required, because, at RESTService it needs
>>>> to add classes as a wrapper.
>>>> My first thought is to create a proxy, however, Application is a class
>>>> and not an interface.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 9:43 AM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>>>> osant...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, there is this line that does not do this verification:
>>>>>
>>>>> application = !InternalApplication.class.isInstance(application) ? new
>>>>> InternalApplication(application) : application;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/server/openejb-rest/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/server/rest/RESTService.java#L224
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 1:07 AM Daniel Cunha <daniels...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It is not injecting the config values for
>>>>>> org.microprofileext.openapi.swaggerui.Templates and yes,
>>>>>> using openejb.cxf-rs.cache-application=false the issue still
>>>>>> happening.
>>>>>> Interesting..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Em qua, 27 de mar de 2019 às 18:24, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>>>>>> osant...@tomitribe.com> escreveu:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > My maven configuration:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > <project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
>>>>>> > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
>>>>>> > xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0
>>>>>> > http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd";>
>>>>>> > <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > <groupId>org.superbiz</groupId>
>>>>>> > <artifactId>env-tomee</artifactId>
>>>>>> > <packaging>war</packaging>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > <name>OpenEJB</name>
>>>>>> > <description>OpenEJB :: Web Examples</description>
>>>>>> > <version>0.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
>>>>>> > <url>http://tomee.apache.org</url>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > <properties>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> <project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding>
>>>>>> > <tomee.version>8.0.0-M2</tomee.version>
>>>>>> > </properties>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > <build>
>>>>>> > <finalName>env-tomee</finalName>
>>>>>> > <plugins>
>>>>>> > <plugin>
>>>>>> > <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
>>>>>> > <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
>>>>>> > <version>3.5.1</version>
>>>>>> > <configuration>
>>>>>> > <source>1.8</source>
>>>>>> > <target>1.8</target>
>>>>>> > </configuration>
>>>>>> > </plugin>
>>>>>> > <plugin>
>>>>>> > <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
>>>>>> > <artifactId>maven-war-plugin</artifactId>
>>>>>> > <version>3.1.0</version>
>>>>>> > </plugin>
>>>>>> > </plugins>
>>>>>> > </build>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > <repositories>
>>>>>> > <repository>
>>>>>> > <id>apache-m2-snapshot</id>
>>>>>> > <name>Apache Snapshot Repository</name>
>>>>>> > <url>
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots
>>>>>> > </url>
>>>>>> > <snapshots>
>>>>>> > <enabled>true</enabled>
>>>>>> > </snapshots>
>>>>>> > </repository>
>>>>>> > </repositories>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > <pluginRepositories>
>>>>>> > <pluginRepository>
>>>>>> > <id>apache.snapshots</id>
>>>>>> > <url>http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/</url>
>>>>>> > </pluginRepository>
>>>>>> > </pluginRepositories>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > <dependencies>
>>>>>> > <dependency>
>>>>>> > <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>> > <artifactId>javaee-api</artifactId>
>>>>>> > <version>8.0</version>
>>>>>> > <scope>provided</scope>
>>>>>> > </dependency>
>>>>>> > <dependency>
>>>>>> > <groupId>org.eclipse.microprofile.openapi</groupId>
>>>>>> > <artifactId>microprofile-openapi-api</artifactId>
>>>>>> > <version>1.1.2</version>
>>>>>> > <scope>provided</scope>
>>>>>> > </dependency>
>>>>>> > <dependency>
>>>>>> > <groupId>org.microprofile-ext.openapi-ext</groupId>
>>>>>> > <artifactId>swagger-ui</artifactId>
>>>>>> > <version>1.0.1</version>
>>>>>> > </dependency>
>>>>>> > </dependencies>
>>>>>> > </project>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > My code:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > @ApplicationPath("api")@OpenAPIDefinition(info = @Info(
>>>>>> > title = "Example application",
>>>>>> > version = "1.0.0",
>>>>>> > contact = @Contact(
>>>>>> > name = "Otavio",
>>>>>> > email = "ota...@otavio.com",
>>>>>> > url = "http://www.otaviojava.com.br";)
>>>>>> > ),
>>>>>> > servers = {
>>>>>> > @Server(url = "/example", description = "localhost")
>>>>>> > }
>>>>>> > )public class MVCApplication extends Application {
>>>>>> > }
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> @Path("envs")@Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)@Consumes(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)@Tag(name
>>>>>> > = "Config Retrieval service", description = "Get the value for a
>>>>>> > certain config")public class EnvironmentResource {
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > @GET
>>>>>> > @Operation(description = "Get the envs")
>>>>>> > @APIResponses({
>>>>>> > @APIResponse(responseCode = "200", description =
>>>>>> > "Successful, returning the value")
>>>>>> > })
>>>>>> > public Map<String, String> getEnvs() {
>>>>>> > return System.getenv();
>>>>>> > }
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > @GET
>>>>>> > @Path("/{key}")
>>>>>> > @Operation(description = "Get the value for this key")
>>>>>> > @APIResponses({
>>>>>> > @APIResponse(responseCode = "200", description =
>>>>>> > "Successful, returning the value")
>>>>>> > })
>>>>>> > @Produces(MediaType.TEXT_PLAIN)
>>>>>> > public Response getConfigValue(@PathParam("key") String key) {
>>>>>> > return Response.ok(key).build();
>>>>>> > }
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > }
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 5:11 PM Daniel Cunha <daniels...@apache.org
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > Can you guys push your sample?
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019, 4:58 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>>>>>> > > osant...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > > Hey Ivan.
>>>>>> > > > I tried something, and I saw the same issue. It seems this
>>>>>> by-pass does
>>>>>> > > not
>>>>>> > > > work.
>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>> > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:18 AM Ivan Junckes Filho <
>>>>>> > > ivanjunc...@gmail.com
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> > > > wrote:
>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>> > > > > It didn't seem to work for me adding the property to
>>>>>> > system.properties.
>>>>>> > > > Any
>>>>>> > > > > ideas what I am doing wrong?
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> > > > > On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:21 AM Roberto Cortez <
>>>>>> radcor...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>> > > > > wrote:
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> > > > > > Hi Ivan,
>>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>>> > > > > > Yes Romain is right, you should set
>>>>>> > openejb.cxf-rs.cache-application
>>>>>> > > =
>>>>>> > > > > > false and it should work. We had to set that for the TCK to
>>>>>> pass,
>>>>>> > but
>>>>>> > > > the
>>>>>> > > > > > config never reached the final distribution. I did notice
>>>>>> that and
>>>>>> > > I’ve
>>>>>> > > > > > added it in case a MP app is detected, but it was after M2
>>>>>> was
>>>>>> > > > released.
>>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>>> > > > > > Cheers,
>>>>>> > > > > > Roberto
>>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>>> > > > > > On 8 Feb 2019, at 21:06, Ivan Junckes Filho <
>>>>>> ivanjunc...@gmail.com
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > > > wrote:
>>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>>> > > > > > I will take a look thanks again Romain
>>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>>> > > > > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 4:38 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>> > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com
>>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>>> > > > > > wrote:
>>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>>> > > > > >> Hey, just recalled we had a flag about it,
>>>>>> > > > > >>
>>>>>> > > > > >> you can skip it setting
>>>>>> openejb.cxf-rs.cache-application=false
>>>>>> > > > > >>
>>>>>> > > > > >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>> > > > > >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>> > > > > >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>> > > > > >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>> > > > > >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>> > > > > >> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>>>>>> > > > > >> <
>>>>>> > > > > >>
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
>>>>>> > > > > >> >
>>>>>> > > > > >>
>>>>>> > > > > >>
>>>>>> > > > > >> Le ven. 8 févr. 2019 à 19:01, Ivan Junckes Filho <
>>>>>> > > > ivanjunc...@gmail.com
>>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>>> > > > > >> a
>>>>>> > > > > >> écrit :
>>>>>> > > > > >>
>>>>>> > > > > >> > Interesting, ok thanks Romain.
>>>>>> > > > > >> >
>>>>>> > > > > >> > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 3:29 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>> > > > > >> rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> > > > > >> > wrote:
>>>>>> > > > > >> >
>>>>>> > > > > >> >> Hi Ivan,
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>
>>>>>> > > > > >> >> In a few cases - don't recall out of my head if it is
>>>>>> all -
>>>>>> > TomEE
>>>>>> > > > > wraps
>>>>>> > > > > >> >> user application in InternalApplication. IIRC it was for
>>>>>> > caching
>>>>>> > > > > >> reason -
>>>>>> > > > > >> >> TomEE not being super cleanly aligned on CDI + to avoid
>>>>>> to get
>>>>>> > > > > multiple
>>>>>> > > > > >> >> instances between runtime and deployment which can
>>>>>> break user
>>>>>> > > code.
>>>>>> > > > > >> >> Enhancing TomEE to no do it anymore or not use a
>>>>>> wrapper when
>>>>>> > not
>>>>>> > > > > >> needed
>>>>>> > > > > >> >> can be a first step fixing that.
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>
>>>>>> > > > > >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>> > > > > >> >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>> > > > > >> >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>> > > > > >> >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>>>>> > > > > >> >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>>>>>> > > > > >> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>>>>>> > > > > >> >> <
>>>>>> > > > > >>
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
>>>>>> > > > > >> >
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>
>>>>>> > > > > >> >> Le ven. 8 févr. 2019 à 18:14, Ivan Junckes Filho <
>>>>>> > > > > >> ivanjunc...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> > > > > >> >> a écrit :
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>> The @OpenAPIDefinition is not being picked up by the
>>>>>> CDI
>>>>>> > > extension
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>> because it is only getting InternalApplication instead
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> > > picking
>>>>>> > > > up
>>>>>> > > > > >> my
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>> custom Application config. Any ideas why?
>>>>>> OpenAPIDefinition
>>>>>> > > > configs
>>>>>> > > > > >> are
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>> therefore not showing up in the openapi doc.
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>>
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>>
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>> @OpenAPIDefinition(info =
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>> @Info(
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>> title = "TEST",
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>> version = "2.0",
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>> description = "Pet Store App API",
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>> license = @License(
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>> name = "Apache 2.0",
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>> url = "
>>>>>> > > > > >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html";),
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>> contact = @Contact(
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>> name = "PetStore API Support",
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>> url = "
>>>>>> > > > > >> https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-open-api";,
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>> email = "supp...@petstore.com
>>>>>> ")
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>> ),
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>> security = @SecurityRequirement(name =
>>>>>> "oauth2"),
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>> servers = @Server(url = "/test/"))
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>> @ApplicationPath("/api")
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>> @LoginConfig(authMethod = "MP-JWT")
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>> public class ApplicationConfiguration extends
>>>>>> Application {
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>>
>>>>>> > > > > >> >>>
>>>>>> > > > > >>
>>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Daniel "soro" Cunha
>>>>>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>>>>>
>>>>>
