Significantly better.  Can you check that in?

What I'm imagining to make it easier to digest the breadth of data:

 - run the asmifier on the unmodified zip
 - check every file into *github*
 - run the asmifier on the modified zip
 - check that in and create a PR
 - we can then pick through the PR to see what's happening


-- 
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com

> On Jun 3, 2020, at 10:45 AM, Jonathan Gallimore 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Made some progress by adjusting the rules - here's the latest counts (not
> including string references):
> 
> Path javax uses total
> ./opensaml-xmlsec-api-3.3.1.jar 2
> ./opensaml-soap-api-3.3.1.jar 5
> ./java-support-7.3.0.jar 12
> ./opensaml-saml-impl-3.3.1.jar 7
> ./opensaml-core-3.3.1.jar 5
> ./opensaml-profile-api-3.3.1.jar 1
> ./opensaml-saml-api-3.3.1.jar 7
> 
> And if we include string references:
> 
> Path javax uses total
> ./servlet-api.jar 26
> ./jakarta.activation-1.2.1.jar 2
> ./jsp-api.jar 13
> ./bval-jsr-2.0.3.jar 1
> ./taglibs-standard-impl-1.2.5.jar 17
> ./openejb-core-8.0.3-SNAPSHOT.jar 41
> ./cxf-core-3.3.6.jar 48
> ./catalina.jar 135
> ./cxf-rt-security-saml-3.3.6.jar 7
> ./cxf-rt-bindings-soap-3.3.6.jar 5
> ./taglibs-standard-jstlel-1.2.5.jar 1
> ./opensaml-xmlsec-api-3.3.1.jar 2
> ./opensaml-security-api-3.3.1.jar 2
> ./jakarta.xml.bind-api-2.3.2.jar 5
> ./taglibs-standard-spec-1.2.5.jar 11
> ./openejb-jee-8.0.3-SNAPSHOT.jar 1
> ./openwebbeans-impl-2.0.12.jar 4
> ./saaj-impl-1.5.1.jar 7
> ./opensaml-soap-api-3.3.1.jar 5
> ./jasper.jar 36
> ./jakarta.faces-2.3.14.jar 165
> ./openejb-client-8.0.3-SNAPSHOT.jar 1
> ./tomcat-util-scan.jar 1
> ./openjpa-3.1.0.jar 80
> ./cxf-rt-rs-security-oauth2-3.3.6.jar 1
> ./java-support-7.3.0.jar 12
> ./cxf-rt-frontend-jaxws-3.3.6.jar 74
> ./cxf-rt-transports-http-3.3.6.jar 10
> ./opensaml-saml-impl-3.3.1.jar 7
> ./catalina-ssi.jar 4
> ./cxf-rt-ws-security-3.3.6.jar 15
> ./javaee-api-8.0-4.jar 47
> ./tomee-catalina-8.0.3-SNAPSHOT.jar 1
> ./opensaml-core-3.3.1.jar 5
> ./cxf-rt-ws-addr-3.3.6.jar 4
> ./eclipselink-2.7.4.jar 177
> ./opensaml-profile-api-3.3.1.jar 1
> ./tomcat-coyote.jar 23
> ./opensaml-saml-api-3.3.1.jar 7
> ./cxf-rt-frontend-jaxrs-3.3.6.jar 3
> 
> This is looking a lot better.
> 
> Jon
> 
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 6:06 PM David Blevins <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>>> On Jun 3, 2020, at 9:03 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Just wanted to follow up with some details on how I'm getting the numbers
>>> below. I'm using this tool: https://github.com/tomitribe/jkta
>> 
>> So people have a heads-up on that tool, I'm currently working on the
>> Tomitribe side with Sonatype to scan all of Maven Central for uses of the
>> affected javax packages.  We'll be building a reporting site to share the
>> data with everyone.  I mention that just in case people get excited and
>> think, "wow, we could help a lot of people with a tool like that!"  Agree
>> and covered :)  "Go big or go home" as they say :)
>> 
>> I unfortunately won't be able to go into much more detail.  I'll just say
>> we're all very excited and we hope to make the javax-to-jakarta transition
>> as survivable as possible.
>> 
>>> Once TomEE is built, I'm extracting the zip, changing to the lib folder,
>>> and running the following commands:
>>> 
>>> for f in *.jar; do java -jar
>>> ~/dev/jkta/target/jkta-0.11-SNAPSHOT-shaded.jar usage jar $f > $f.tsv;
>> done
>>> for f in *.jar; do java -jar
>>> ~/dev/jkta/target/jkta-0.11-SNAPSHOT-shaded.jar usage jar
>>> --include-strings=true $f > $f.strings.tsv; done
>>> java -jar ~/dev/jkta/target/jkta-0.11-SNAPSHOT-shaded.jar usage dir . >
>>> jars.tsv
>>> java -jar ~/dev/jkta/target/jkta-0.11-SNAPSHOT-shaded.jar usage dir
>>> --include-strings=true . > jars.strings.tsv
>>> 
>>> The goal to see what the gaps are from the transformation process and
>> close
>>> those gaps.
>> 
>> I'll dig in and see what I can find.  I've had my nose deep in ASM for a
>> few weeks now, so we'll see if helps.
>> 
>> 
>> -David
>> 
>> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to