Hi Cesar, very good finding!
The latest PR build is green. Thanks Richard Am Mittwoch, den 10.02.2021, 12:04 -0600 schrieb Cesar Hernandez: > Hi, > > As a follow-up, I identified that the space in the "Pull Request" > Jenkins > job name may have been the issue on the failing test [1] we have been > seeing in PR's results. > > I made local tests for tomee/examples/webservice-ssl-client-cert and > I just > renamed the job and trigger a rebuild: > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/TomEE/job/pull-request/ > If this fixes the issue we can also scape quotes in the Keystore and > key > generation that occurs during the integration between the ant run and > shell > script generateKeyPair.bat and generateServerKey.bat. But let's see > first > the result we get. > > [1] > .. > /home/jenkins/jenkins-agent/workspace/Tomee/*Pull Requests* > /examples/webservice-ssl-client-cert/target/classes > .. > do.sun.jdk: > [echo] *** Running on a Sun JDK *** > [echo] generate server keys > [java] Illegal option:* > Requests/examples/webservice-ssl-client-cert/target/serverStore.jks* > [java] keytool -genkeypair [OPTION]... > > > El lun, 8 feb 2021 a las 0:30, Jean-Louis Monteiro (< > [email protected]>) escribió: > > > I agree. > > Would be awesome to have something more stable. It's better than it > > was. > > But still some work to do. > > > > Le ven. 5 févr. 2021 à 19:55, Zowalla, Richard < > > [email protected]> a écrit : > > > > > Hi Cesar, > > > > > > would be very much appreciated, I guess. > > > > > > I noticed, that the PR jenkins job shows a different behaviour > > > compared > > to > > > the master job in terms of reproducability. > > > In general, we should have a deeper look at the config to make > > > the CI > > > behave more robust. > > > > > > Gruss > > > Richard > > > -- > > > Richard Zowalla, M.Sc. > > > Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter > > > > > > Medizinische Informatik > > > Hochschule Heilbronn > > > Max-Planck-Str. 39 > > > D-74081 Heilbronn > > > > > > Mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________ > > > Von: Cesar Hernandez [[email protected]] > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Februar 2021 22:01 > > > An: [email protected] > > > Betreff: Re: TomEE-2966: JUnit5 OpenEJB Extension Module - Any > > > thoughts? > > > > > > > They even work locally. Might bei Jenkins / CI related? > > > > > > It could be, I've been also following up with an issue on the > > > Jenkins Job > > > we have for Pull request. > > > > > > My proposal would be to start migrating the jobs to Jenkins > > > pipelines so > > we > > > can have a better way to collaborate in the jobs configuration. > > > > > > > > > El mar, 2 feb 2021 a las 10:43, Zowalla, Richard (< > > > [email protected]>) escribió: > > > > > > > Hi Cesar, > > > > > > > > it seems, that the master build is fine again. The last run did > > succeed, > > > > so I guess the tests failed with some sort of race condition. > > > > They even > > > > work locally. Might bei Jenkins / CI related? > > > > > > > > Gruss > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > ________________________________________ > > > > Von: Cesar Hernandez [[email protected]] > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Februar 2021 17:05 > > > > An: [email protected] > > > > Betreff: Re: TomEE-2966: JUnit5 OpenEJB Extension Module - Any > > thoughts? > > > > Hi Richard, > > > > > > > > Thank you for the PR and context provided. > > > > We now have back the Jenkins job on master at demand, I left > > > > yesterday > > a > > > > build[1] and after 6 hours we got 4 tests[2] but as far as I > > > > can see > > they > > > > are not related to this new extension module :). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/TomEE/job/master-build-full/72/ > > > > [2] > > > > org.apache.ziplock.maven.MvnTest.main > > > > org.apache.ziplock.maven.MvnTest.test > > > > org.superbiz.mvc.MvcTest.org.superbiz.mvc.MvcTest > > > > org.superbiz.mvc.MvcTest.org.superbiz.mvc.MvcTest > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > El lun, 1 feb 2021 a las 3:12, Zowalla, Richard (< > > > > [email protected]>) escribió: > > > > > > > > > I went ahead with it and merged it. This shouldn't influence > > > > > anything > > > > > on the master as it is just a new module. > > > > > > > > > > However, it enables some of our users to upgrade their legacy > > > > > testing > > > > > (without application composer or arquillian) environments to > > > > > pure > > > > > junit5. > > > > > > > > > > Gruss > > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 27.01.2021, 17:25 +0000 schrieb Zowalla, > > > > > Richard: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > a few days ago, I had a (virtual) coffee discussion with my > > colleguae > > > > > > Martin W. about moving some of our research projects > > > > > > towards pure > > > > > > JUnit > > > > > > 5. > > > > > > > > > > > > The missing thing: An openejb-junit module, which comes > > > > > > without a > > > > > > transient compile dependency towards junit4. > > > > > > > > > > > > Today, I had some time and implemented a first draft > > > > > > towards an > > > > > > additional openejb-junit5 module, which does not depend on > > > > > > junit4 > > > > > > anymore. > > > > > > > > > > > > The PR is open for discussion / review, see [1]. > > > > > > > > > > > > If someone has additional ideas, thoughts or improvements, > > > > > > I would > > be > > > > > > very happy about them! > > > > > > > > > > > > Gruss > > > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/759 > > > > > -- > > > > > Richard Zowalla, M.Sc. > > > > > Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics > > > > > > > > > > Hochschule Heilbronn – University of Applied Sciences > > > > > Max-Planck-Str. 39 > > > > > D-74081 Heilbronn > > > > > phone: +49 7131 504 6791 > > > > > mail: [email protected] > > > > > web: https://www.mi.hs-heilbronn.de/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Atentamente: > > > > César Hernández. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Atentamente: > > > César Hernández. > > > > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
