Thanks to you both! Am Montag, dem 14.02.2022 um 23:26 +0100 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro: > I'd probably agree. > > I went and pushed a merged version with > https://github.com/apache/tomee-jakartaee-api/commit/fcaa0bb099cb06b6ca59a330a76c194185128372 > The feature for OSGI still needs some love and I have to review and > replace > remaining Geronimo specs were we have jakarta equivalents. > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:06 PM David Blevins < > [email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On Feb 14, 2022, at 4:42 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > I did a pom.xml comparison and it looks like in > > tomee-jakarta/jakartaee-api > > > module you used most of the jakarta.xxx dependencies as opposed > > > to the > > > usual Geronimo specs. > > > Is there a reason? > > > > I don't recall off the top of my head, but I suspect it was that we > > didn't > > have jakarta versions of the Geronimo API jars and some APIs were > > updated > > slightly, like EJB, so a straight translation would hit issues. I > > think it > > was a "I don't want to deal with this now" move. > > > > > > We could use either, though there is no longer the licensing > > restriction > > that forced us to create the Geronimo API jars in the first place. > > > > Were it me, I'd continue to use the jars which are implementations > > (javamail, activation, etc), but the others that are pure APIs, I'm > > not > > sure it's worth the effort. > > > > > > -David > > > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
