Hello,

The PR was approved earlier today.  I will work on getting them moved to the 
official images.

Thanks,
Rod.


On 2/16/22, 5:02 AM, "Jean-Louis Monteiro" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL email. Use 
CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or responding. (Sender: 
[email protected])

    
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Should be ok

    Le mer. 16 févr. 2022 à 09:21, Thomas Andraschko <
    [email protected]> a écrit :

    > Hi,
    >
    > could anyone merge it?
    > I would also like to see Java17 images.
    >
    > Best Regards,
    > Thomas
    >
    > Am Do., 27. Jan. 2022 um 21:22 Uhr schrieb Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) <
    > [email protected]>:
    >
    > > Hello,
    > >
    > > I have created the PR for the OpenJDK.
    > >
    > > https://github.com/tomitribe/docker-tomee/pull/59
    > >
    > > I would encourage folks to test this new build.
    > >
    > > If the community decides they want OpenJDK,  approve the request and I
    > > will update the official images in dockerhub.
    > >
    > > Thank you,
    > > Rod.
    > >
    > >
    > > On 1/24/22, 11:32 AM, "Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)" <
    > [email protected]>
    > > wrote:
    > >
    > >     Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL email.
    > > Use CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or 
responding.
    > > (Sender: [email protected])
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > >
    > >
    > >     Hello,
    > >
    > >     If we use Temurin, I would recommend the tag 17-jre-focal.  That 
uses
    > > Ubuntu for an OS, very slight change in OS.
    > >
    > >     If we decide on OpenJDK, I would recommend the tag 17-jdk-bullseye.
    > > Currently, we are using 11-jre.  11-jre is Debian Bullseye.  We would be
    > > consistent with the OS
    > >
    > >     I would recommend 17-jdk-bullseye.  It keeps us more constant with
    > the
    > > OS, even though it is larger than a jre.  I am going to move down this
    > path
    > > unless anyone objects.
    > >
    > >     Do we need a vote for something like this?
    > >
    > >     Thank you,
    > >     Rod Jenkins
    > >
    > >
    > >     On 1/14/22, 10:49 AM, "Anbu Sampath" <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >
    > >         Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL
    > > email. Use CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or
    > > responding. (Sender: dev-return-28764-JENKIR14=
    > > [email protected])
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > >
    > >
    > >         Hi All,
    > >
    > >         Eclipse Temurin started producing JRE, I guess TomEE can use it
    > > for Java 17.
    > >
    > >         https://blog.adoptium.net/2021/12/eclipse-temurin-jres-are-back/
    > >
    > >         Regards
    > >         Anbu
    > >
    > >
    > >         On Thu, 13 Jan, 2022, 03:49 Jean-Louis Monteiro, <
    > > [email protected]>
    > >         wrote:
    > >
    > >         > No, I was referring to what Rod was proposing.
    > >         >
    > >         > Checkout the following https://adoptium.net/
    > >         > Eclipse OpenJ9 is discontinued because IBM is taking over with
    > > IBM Semeru.
    > >         >
    > >         > Adoptium and Eclipse Temurin aim at producing AdoptOpenJDK
    > > distributions.
    > >         >
    > >         > --
    > >         > Jean-Louis Monteiro
    > >         > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
    > >         > http://www.tomitribe.com
    > >         >
    > >         >
    > >         > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 10:52 PM Alex The Rocker <
    > > [email protected]>
    > >         > wrote:
    > >         >
    > >         > > Hello Jean-Louis,
    > >         > >
    > >         > > Not sure what you mean by "Eclipse JRE", but maybe it's IBM
    > > Semeru
    > >         > > Runtimes JRE, which is based on Eclipse OpenJ9 (IBM Semer
    > open
    > > edition
    > >         > > was previously branded as "AdoptOpenJDK OpenJ9").
    > >         > >
    > >         > > That's what we use both our our container & VM based 
services
    > >         > >
    > >         > > Hope it helps,
    > >         > >
    > >         > > Alex
    > >         > >
    > >         > > Le mer. 12 janv. 2022 à 22:05, Jean-Louis Monteiro
    > >         > > <[email protected]> a écrit :
    > >         > > >
    > >         > > > Hi Rod,
    > >         > > >
    > >         > > > We can try the Eclipse JRE, at least for our own 
knowledge.
    > >         > > > For the Docker images, I'd probably go with OpenJDK for
    > > consistency in
    > >         > > > behavior even though it's bigger than JRE
    > >         > > > --
    > >         > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
    > >         > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
    > >         > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
    > >         > > >
    > >         > > >
    > >         > > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 7:12 PM Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) <
    > >         > > > [email protected]> wrote:
    > >         > > >
    > >         > > > > Hello all,
    > >         > > > >
    > >         > > > > I am working on the Java17 TomEE containers.  The other
    > > TomEE 8
    > >         > > containers
    > >         > > > > use 11-jre or 8-jre tags from OpenJDK.  However, OpenJDK
    > > did not
    > >         > > release a
    > >         > > > > jre for 17.  All I see is 17-jdk.
    > >         > > > >
    > >         > > > > I think we need a discussion on what we want to do.  
Here
    > > are a
    > >         > couple
    > >         > > > > options:
    > >         > > > >
    > >         > > > >
    > >         > > > >   1.  Use OpenJDK 17-jdk
    > >         > > > >   2.  Use Eclipse Temurin 17-jre
    > >         > > > >
    > >         > > > > I am going to test with option #2.  If anyone would like
    > > to throw out
    > >         > > > > other options, that would be great.
    > >         > > > >
    > >         > > > > Thank you,
    > >         > > > > Rod Jenkins
    > >         > > > >
    > >         > >
    > >         >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    >

Reply via email to