Well, I'm asking because it somehow blocks me at the minute. I'm not saying I can't fix it in another way.
Long story short, it has dependency on javax.xml.rpc which I left available in jakartaee-api jar. So far so good. But the JAX-RPC api has dependency on other javax.* spec that migrated to jakarta.* namespace. Of course I could relocate javax.xml.rpc in the jakartaee-api jar to use jakarta.xml.rpc instead and do a sed on our sources. But that specific namespace is not part of what got moved to jakarta namespace. So we would end up with something bad. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 6:48 PM David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm certainly +1 for pruning it, but would prefer we get the basic > javax-jakarta PR merged with a green build and then go about cleaning up > stuff like that. > > I think we could spend several weeks cleaning out things from 9.0 that we > don't want or need. > > That assumes it's possible. Might be something complicating the > javax-to-jakarta namespace transition. > > > -- > David Blevins > http://twitter.com/dblevins > http://www.tomitribe.com > > On Feb 23, 2022, at 10:32 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Trying to move forward with TomEE 9.x > > We do have a pretty old openejb-axis. We don't use it by default because we > use CXF. It's used mainly for JAX-RPC which is out of the landscape for EE > 9, so I'm tempted to remove it. > > Any thoughts? > > Wze have more deep dependencies to javax.xml.rpc and it might become harder > to solve. > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > >
