> > > The trick is that setup is difficult to maintain and can be quite > > intimidating.
I can remember ;) - my first attempts in May 21 were indeed intimidating. > Richard, have you tried to run any tests yet? If not, are you > possibly willing to be the brave guy who tries it first, hits the > issues and works with myself or Jean-Louis to smooth the path for > Zoltán and others? Not for the current M8 Snapshot yet. Last time I did run (some) tests of the ee9 tck was in May 21 - my tech stack switched, so I have to set it up from scratch again. There can be no better environment to try and hit the (setup) issues - so yes, count me in ;) As far as I can remember, the README also needs an overhaul and we should include the handy script, which does some of the setup automatically. I think, that David posted it on the list. I think, that we also need to switch to a dedicated tomee-8.x branch and move the tomee-9.x branch to master in the tomee-tck harness repo. Gruß Richard Am Sonntag, dem 24.04.2022 um 13:47 -0700 schrieb David Blevins: > If we could get a few more people familiar with running the Jakarta > EE TCK in TomEE and ready to start fixing test failures, that'd be > the biggest impact on all our current and future certification > efforts. > > The trick is that setup is difficult to maintain and can be quite > intimidating. > > Richard, have you tried to run any tests yet? If not, are you > possibly willing to be the brave guy who tries it first, hits the > issues and works with myself or Jean-Louis to smooth the path for > Zoltán and others? > > Truthfully, it's something we should be doing before every release on > any branch. It's another particularly large release process gap we > do need to eventually fill. > > > -David > > > > On Apr 24, 2022, at 2:06 AM, Zowalla, Richard < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Zoltán, > > > > It's very great from you and it's truly awesome when a long time > > user > > of TomEE decides to contribute :) > > > > First of all, do not get intimidated by your first ticket. If it > > ends > > up being too hard or just not fun, let's find something else for > > you. > > There is always plenty of work to do. > > > > We are currently working on TomEE 9. Therefore, we moved away from > > our > > previous byte code transformation approach and switched TomEE > > master to > > TomEE 9 (Jakarta). > > > > While we made good progress, there is still a lot todo. The efforts > > and > > open tasks are tracked in [1]. A lot of effort is currently done to > > switch the MicroProfile impl to MP Smallrye impls in order to move > > to > > the jakarta namespace [2]. > > > > If you are interested in contributing to our TomEE 9 efforts, we > > can > > surely find some beginner friendly tasks in this area. > > > > Gruß > > Richard > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3862 > > [2] > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hdntdhwqkr91o2mszojq66qcfzszw96p > > > > > > Am Samstag, dem 23.04.2022 um 20:21 +0200 schrieb Zoltán Tichov: > > > Hi! > > > > > > I live in Hungary. I am working at an IT company as a software > > > developer, I > > > develop java > > > webapps with jsf (PrimeFaces) and microservice like apps without > > > any > > > container technology > > > and Oracle database. > > > > > > We want to switch to jakarta ee 9 at the company, but > > > unfortunately > > > we ran > > > into problems with tomee 9 and I would like to contribute to > > > fixing > > > these > > > bugs and possibly improving tomee jakarta 10. (I'm sorry to read > > > on > > > another > > > tomee mailing list, that you had to skip jakarta ee 8 and 9 > > > compliance > > > entirely) > > > I use java 11 and netbeans on windows 10. If we don't have to, we > > > don't > > > want to use another app server because we've been using tomee > > > since > > > 1.7.3. > > > > > > Best regards: Zoltán Tichov
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
