Yes because from a license point of view hosting the source code wouldn't ne great ;-)
Am 5. September 2023 22:58:17 MESZ schrieb "Benedict Eisenkrämer" <bened...@eisenkramer.de>: >Hi Richard, > >I have created a PR, for now with the copied files. > >I am currently trying to run the tests with the staging repositories >dependency, which seems to work. >I think that would be acceptable at the moment, as we are still in development? > >Gruß Benedict > >On 05.09.23 21:44, Richard Zowalla wrote: >> Hey Benedict, >> >> seems they are still working on it. It is available for 3.1.3-1 in >> their staging repo: https://github.com/jakartaee/rest/issues/1142 >> >> Gruß >> Richard >> >> Am Montag, dem 04.09.2023 um 18:02 +0200 schrieb Benedict Eisenkrämer: >>> Sounds good to me, I will try to create one tomorrow. >>> About the maven artifact, I actually had the same plan there, yet >>> could >>> not find one: >>> >>> * It is not listed on the specification-site: >>> https://jakarta.ee/specifications/restful-ws/3.0/ >>> * It is not listed in mvn central: >>> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/jakarta.ws >>> * Some google searches yielded no results as well >>> >>> Maybe you or someone else has an idea where to look or could >>> enlighten me. >>> >>> >>> On 04.09.23 17:27, Richard Zowalla wrote: >>>> Hi Benedict, >>>> >>>> perhaps worth to create a PR with the setup targeting the main >>>> branch, so it is part >>>> ofhttps://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/main/tck ? >>>> >>>> There might be a Maven artifact available, so we don't need to >>>> copy/paste the sources. >>>> >>>> Gruß >>>> Richard >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 18. August 2023 19:20:24 MESZ schrieb "Benedict >>>> Eisenkrämer"<bened...@eisenkramer.de>: >>>>> Small correction, I meant Richards-Branch, he shared in an other >>>>> thread: >>>>> https://github.com/rzo1/tomee/tree/cxf4 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 18.08.23 19:15, Benedict Eisenkrämer wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I now have a kind of working setup for the tck, related to this >>>>>> ticket:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4166 >>>>>> The setup tests against this modified main-branch of the tomee- >>>>>> repository:https://github.com/Sollder11/tomee >>>>>> I only changed a few things with the embedded-tomee there. >>>>>> My current tck-setup can be found >>>>>> here:https://gitlab.com/Sollder1/tomee-10-jaxrs-tck-setup-tests >>>>>> >>>>>> My last result was: >>>>>> [INFO] >>>>>> [INFO] Results: >>>>>> [INFO] >>>>>> [ERROR] Failures: >>>>>> [ERROR] JAXRSClientIT.<init>:59->usersetup:97 user >>>>>> not set ==> expected: <true> but was: <false> >>>>>> [ERROR] JAXRSClientIT.<init>:59->usersetup:97 user >>>>>> not set ==> expected: <true> but was: <false> >>>>>> [ERROR] JAXRSBasicClientIT.<init>:59->JAXRSClient.setup:53 user >>>>>> was not set ==> expected: <true> but was: <false> >>>>>> [ERROR] JAXRSBasicClientIT.<init>:59->JAXRSClient.setup:53 user >>>>>> was not set ==> expected: <true> but was: <false> >>>>>> [ERROR] JAXRSBasicClientIT.<init>:59->JAXRSClient.setup:53 user >>>>>> was not set ==> expected: <true> but was: <false> >>>>>> [ERROR] JAXRSBasicClientIT.<init>:59->JAXRSClient.setup:53 user >>>>>> was not set ==> expected: <true> but was: <false> >>>>>> [ERROR] JAXRSBasicClientIT.<init>:59->JAXRSClient.setup:53 user >>>>>> was not set ==> expected: <true> but was: <false> >>>>>> [ERROR] JAXRSClientIT.sseBroadcastTest:193- >>>>>>> JAXRSCommonClient.assertEquals:721 >>>>>> [Ljava.lang.Object;@43a8dd9b ==> expected: <true> but was: >>>>>> <false> >>>>>> [ERROR] JAXRSClientIT.dynamicFeatureIsRegisteredTest:111- >>>>>>> JAXRSCommonClient.assertEquals:721 >>>>>> [Ljava.lang.Object;@7b8f8de5 ==> expected: <true> but was: >>>>>> <false> >>>>>> [ERROR] JAXRSClientIT.featureIsRegisteredTest:93- >>>>>>> JAXRSCommonClient.assertEquals:721 >>>>>> [Ljava.lang.Object;@6c4cfe0e ==> expected: <true> but was: >>>>>> <false> >>>>>> [ERROR] Errors: >>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>> JAXRSClientIT.clientSideReaderIsNotUsedOnServerTest:124- >>>>>>> JaxrsCommonClient.invoke:219 » Fault >>>>>> [ERROR] JAXRSClientIT.clientSideReaderIsUsedOnClientTest:195- >>>>>>> JaxrsCommonClient.invoke:219 » Fault >>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>> JAXRSClientIT.clientSideWriterIsNotUsedOnServerTest:159- >>>>>>> JaxrsCommonClient.invoke:219 » Fault >>>>>> [ERROR] JAXRSClientIT.clientSideWriterIsUsedOnClientTest:234- >>>>>>> JaxrsCommonClient.invoke:219 » Fault >>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>> JAXRSClientIT.serverSideReaderIsNotUsedOnClientTest:177- >>>>>>> JaxrsCommonClient.invoke:219 » Fault >>>>>> [ERROR] JAXRSClientIT.serverSideReaderIsUsedOnServerTest:107- >>>>>>> JaxrsCommonClient.invoke:219 » Fault >>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>> JAXRSClientIT.serverSideWriterIsNotUsedOnClientTest:213- >>>>>>> JaxrsCommonClient.invoke:219 » Fault >>>>>> [ERROR] JAXRSClientIT.serverSideWriterIsUsedOnServerTest:141- >>>>>>> JaxrsCommonClient.invoke:219 » Fault >>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>> SeBootstrapIT.shouldBootInstanceDespiteUnknownConfigurationPara >>>>>> meters:236 » AbstractMethod >>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>> SeBootstrapIT.shouldBootInstanceUsingConvenienceMethods:148 >>>>>> » AbstractMethod R... >>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>> SeBootstrapIT.shouldBootInstanceUsingDefaults:71 » >>>>>> AbstractMethod Receiver cla... >>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>> SeBootstrapIT.shouldBootInstanceUsingExternalConfiguration:186 >>>>>> » AbstractMethod >>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>> SeBootstrapIT.shouldBootInstanceUsingImplementationsDefaultIpPo >>>>>> rt:317 » AbstractMethod >>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>> SeBootstrapIT.shouldBootInstanceUsingProperties:107 » >>>>>> AbstractMethod Receiver ... >>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>> SeBootstrapIT.shouldBootInstanceUsingSelfDetectedFreeIpPort:280 >>>>>> » AbstractMethod >>>>>> [ERROR] JAXRSSigTestIT.signatureTest:412 Fault >>>>>> JAXRSSigTestIT.signatureTest() failed!,... >>>>>> [INFO] >>>>>> [ERROR] Tests run: 2796, Failures: 10, Errors: 16, Skipped: 128 >>>>>> [INFO] >>>>>> >>>>>> The full result may be found >>>>>> here:https://gitlab.com/Sollder1/tomee-10-jaxrs-tck-setup-tests >>>>>> /-/tree/main/runs/sollder1/_18082023_1903?ref_type=heads >>>>>> >>>>>> As can be expected the tests for the new SE-Bootstrap fail, as >>>>>> this is a new feature in JakartaEE10. >>>>>> Also all the Authorization / Security Tests fail, I do not >>>>>> really get what to do there ,as the documentation is rather >>>>>> vague here. >>>>>> The other issues may very well be related to the fact, that the >>>>>> cxf-version used is not actually compatible. >>>>>> >>>>>> Some feedback/inside would be very much appreciated. >>>>>> >>>>>> I will try to run against the Roberts branch next, which >>>>>> already includes the newest cxf version and seems to have only >>>>>> four failures with the old tck. >>>>>> I think this should result in a few more tests succeeding, >>>>>> although cxf4 is not yet fully JakartaEE10 compatible. >>>>>> >>>>>> Gruß Benedict >
