Looking in the distribution I don't see any of these jars then. Do you
agree?

On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:11 AM Richard Zowalla <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Some of these dependencies aren't shipped with the TomEE distribution.
> Best way to check is to actually look through /lib
>
>
>
> Am 11. Oktober 2023 16:56:27 MESZ schrieb Jamie Johnson <[email protected]
> >:
> >There are other vulnerabilities (pulled from https://osv.dev/) that can
> be
> >addressed, but need to be reviewed.  The format below is dependency
> >current_version (fix_version).
> >
> >org.apache.httpcomponents:httpclient 4.2.2 (>= 4.5.13)
> >GHSA-2x83-r56g-cv47 (4.2.3), GHSA-7r82-7xv7-xcpj
> >(4.5.13), GHSA-fmj5-wv96-r2ch (4.3.6), GHSA-cfh5-3ghh-wfjx (4.3.5)
> >
> >xalan:xalan 2.7.2 (2.7.3)
> >GHSA-9339-86wc-4qgf (2.7.3)
> >
> >org.apache.commons:commons-compress 1.14 (>=1.24.0)
> >GHSA-hrmr-f5m6-m9pq (1.18), GHSA-xqfj-vm6h-2x34 (1.22),
> GHSA-h436-432x-8fvx
> >(1.16), GHSA-crv7-7245-f45f (1.21), GHSA-mc84-pj99-q6hh
> >(1.21), GHSA-7hfm-57qf-j43q (1.21), GHSA-cgwf-w82q-5jrr (1.24.0)
> >
> >org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server 9.4.49.v20220914 (9.4.51.v20230217)
> >GHSA-qw69-rqj8-6qw8 (9.4.51.v20230217), GHSA-p26g-97m4-6q7c
> >(9.4.51.v20230217)
> >
> >org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http 9.4.49.v20220914 (>=9.4.53)
> >GHSA-hmr7-m48g-48f6 (9.4.52), GHSA-wgh7-54f2-x98r (9.4.53)
> >
> >org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-servlets 9.4.49.v20220914 (9.4.53)
> >GHSA-3gh6-v5v9-6v9j (9.4.53)
> >
> >org.apache.sshd:sshd-core 2.1.0 (>=2.10.0)
> >GHSA-9279-7hph-r3xw (2.7.0), GHSA-fhw8-8j55-vwgq
> >(2.9.2), GHSA-mjmq-gwgm-5qhm (2.10.0)
> >
> >com.google.code.gson:gson 2.2.4 (2.8.9)
> >GHSA-4jrv-ppp4-jm57 (2.8.9)
> >
> >org.webjars:handlebars 1.2.1 (4.7.7)
> >GHSA-f2jv-r9rf-7988 (4.7.7)
> >
> >org.apache.ivy:ivy 2.3.0 (>= 2.5.2)
> >GHSA-wv7w-rj2x-556x (2.5.1), GHSA-2jc4-r94c-rp7h (2.5.2)
> >
> >
> >On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 6:49 AM Jamie Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> How deep down the rabbit hole should the dependency checks normally go?
> >> Looks like the big ones I was tracking with security updates were done.
> >>
> >> johnzon 1.2.21
> >> tomcat 9.0.81
> >> bouncy castle 1.76
> >>
> >> Still poking around a bit but there’s obviously a lot.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 2:09 AM Richard Zowalla <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> In theory, every committer can act as release manager.
> >>>
> >>> There are some steps in the process, which requires PMC karma, though
> >>> (such as adding a key to the KEYS file, moving stuff to the release are
> >>> on SVN, start the VOTE, etc.).
> >>>
> >>> The process is documented here: [1]
> >>>
> >>> That being said:
> >>>
> >>> I am currently planning to start the release process for TomEE 9.1.1
> >>> within this week. Due to the Tomcat security issues released yesterday,
> >>> we need to do some backporting, which will consume additional time. (It
> >>> just interrupted my preparations, so it needs additional CI / TCK
> >>> cycles)
> >>>
> >>> A release usally consumes around 1-3 hours of work. Mostly because you
> >>> have to wait for stuff being build or to run some basic sanity checks
> >>> before starting and to not forget any step.
> >>>
> >>> What would really help for a TomEE 8.0.16 is to carefully re-check the
> >>> current dependencies for important 3rd party dependencies (and update
> >>> if needed. Note: Each update or bunch of updates shouldn't break the
> >>> build. A full build on CI takes around 4-8 hours) on that branch, build
> >>> it locally and conduct some sanity checks (for example: same lib in
> >>> different versions in /lib -> check and fix) with the created
> >>> tar.gz/zip files.
> >>>
> >>> This is one of the steps, which usually consumes a lot of time. If you
> >>> want to give it a try, I am happy to help out for the steps which
> >>> require PMC involvement. Otherwise, I might find some time in the next
> >>> week to start a release of 8.0.16 - just let me know and I can plan my
> >>> time accordingly ;-)
> >>>
> >>> Gruß
> >>> Richard
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://tomee.apache.org/dev/release-tomee.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Am Dienstag, dem 10.10.2023 um 17:56 -0500 schrieb Jonathan S. Fisher:
> >>> > Jean-Louis, are there directions anywhere? Not promising anything :)
> >>> >
> >>> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 5:22 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Whomever is committer can do it.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I was just trying to give you an honest reply regarding my
> >>> > > availabilities
> >>> > > and give visibility to the rest of the community and the other
> >>> > > committers
> >>> > > at the same time.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Hope it helps.
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Le mar. 10 oct. 2023, 23:27, Jamie Johnson <[email protected]> a
> >>> > > écrit :
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > I’m not sure what that entails or who would go about doing it. Is
> >>> > > > it a
> >>> > > > community or contributor driven thing?
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 3:25 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> >>> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > > I think most of the energy is currently on TomEE 9 and the new
> >>> > > > > TomEE 10.
> >>> > > > > I've also noticed some Tomcat CVE today if I remember
> >>> > > > > correctly.
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > I'm all hands on TomEE 10 currently because we need to fill the
> >>> > > > > feature
> >>> > > > > gaps on all implementations. So speaking about myself, not sure
> >>> > > > > I can
> >>> > > > > trigger a build and deliver the whole process in the next
> >>> > > > > couple of days
> >>> > > > or
> >>> > > > > weeks.
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > If someone can do it, I'm happy to review, test and vote on the
> >>> > > > > release.
> >>> > > > > --
> >>> > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >>> > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> >>> > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 5:48 PM Jamie Johnson
> >>> > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > > Is there a timeline for the release of 8.0.16?  There are a
> >>> > > > > > few
> >>> > > > security
> >>> > > > > > issues associated with johnzon that we’d like to leverage
> >>> > > > > > while we
> >>> > > > > migrate
> >>> > > > > > to a newer version of TomEE.
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
>

Reply via email to