They could be yanked. There are also a handful of flags/system properties that have "geronimo" in them and enable geronimo-specific functionality. Those flags can be yanked along with the related functionality (if it is only used there).
Also any functionality related to Axis 1.x can be yanked as that was all Geronimo specific. We never really did a cleanup in this regard. -David > On Dec 12, 2023, at 11:50 PM, Richard Zowalla <r...@apache.org> wrote: > > So if no one was interested since ~ 2012 (no bug reports, etc.), should > n't we just remove it? > > Am Dienstag, dem 12.12.2023 um 07:05 -0800 schrieb David Blevins: >> Those we there for Geronimo's benefit as it became osgi-based in the >> last few years it was around. I suspect they've not consistently >> been updated after around 2012. >> >> >> -David >> >>> On Nov 9, 2023, at 4:51 AM, Mark Struberg >>> <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID> wrote: >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> Seems we do need to update our OSGi import declarations? >>> view- >>> source:https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/tomee/openejb- >>> core/9.1.1/openejb-core-9.1.1.pom >>> >>> org.apache.openejb.jee.wls;version="[4.0,5)", >>> org.apache.openejb.loader;version="[4.0,5)", >>> org.apache.openejb.client;bundle- >>> version="[4.0,5.0)";resolution:=optional, >>> org.apache.openejb.client.proxy;bundle- >>> version="[4.0,5.0)";resolution:=optional, >>> org.apache.openejb.client.java;bundle- >>> version="[4.0,5.0)";resolution:=optional, >>> org.openejb.client;bundle- >>> version="[4.0,5.0)";resolution:=optional, >>> >>> org.apache.openjpa.event;resolution:=optional;version="[2.1,3)", >>> >>> org.apache.openjpa.persistence;resolution:=optional;version="[2.1,3 >>> )", >>> org.apache.webbeans.annotation;version="[1.1,2)", >>> org.apache.webbeans.component;version="[1.1,2)", >>> org.apache.webbeans.component.creation;version="[1.1,2)", >>> org.apache.webbeans.config;version="[1.1,2)", >>> Sounds really outdated to me. >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> strub >> >
