I've created a WIP PR which had the changes I had: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1090.
Still working on unit test failures, and likely isn't complete. I'll keep plugging away, but equally happy for someone else to incorporate this into another PR, or trash this and do something else, or whatever - I'm happy either way. Jon On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 11:08 AM Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Awesome. I'll take a look. > > Jon > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 10:50 AM Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com> > wrote: > >> Hey Jon, >> >> your changes (if they are committed at the ee10 migrate merge) are >> basically already on "main" :) >> >> Gruß >> Richard >> >> Am Montag, dem 08.01.2024 um 10:37 +0000 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: >> > I did _some_ work on concurrency a while back. Very happy to rebase >> > it - >> > maybe it helps even if it isn't complete. >> > >> > Jon >> > >> > On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 5:40 PM Thomas Andraschko < >> > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > 1) OpenJPA: couldnt we just set EclipseLink as our default for now? >> > > We dont >> > > need to remove it, but leaving it as default is not a good >> > > decision. >> > > 2) BatchEE: Is there a alternative impl for now available? I can >> > > try to >> > > migrate BatchEE to jakarta later but for now the highest prio for >> > > me and my >> > > company to migrate to a EE10 container. >> > > 3) Concurency: Can you point me to the sources? I will try to work >> > > on it >> > > upcoming week. >> > > >> > > Am Fr., 5. Jan. 2024 um 11:07 Uhr schrieb Richard Zowalla < >> > > rich...@zowalla.com>: >> > > >> > > > I have tested a custom TomEE 10 build (with fixed deps) for quite >> > > > a while >> > > > now and it worked for my usecases. >> > > > >> > > > What needs to be done (imho): >> > > > >> > > > - We need to have stable versions for BatchEE and OpenJPA. >> > > > Currently, >> > > they >> > > > are only SNAPSHOT. >> > > > >> > > > - Implement the concurrency changes. Currently, they are only >> > > > added as >> > > > stub impls. (I am not using that in my test env, so didn't >> > > > encounter >> > > issues) >> > > > >> > > > - TCK still hangs but isn't a blocker for a milestone imho. >> > > > >> > > > Thoughts? >> > > > >> > > > Gruß >> > > > Richard >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Am 5. Januar 2024 10:40:05 MEZ schrieb Thomas Andraschko < >> > > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: >> > > > > i would like to have everything apache, too but i think our >> > > > > goal must be >> > > > to >> > > > > get a TomEE10-M1 release out ASAP. >> > > > > we can later easily make openjpa the default again. >> > > > > >> > > > > how should we proceed here? >> > > > > i have some time slots to work on something and provide PRs, we >> > > > > just >> > > need >> > > > > some decisions. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Am Mo., 20. Nov. 2023 um 23:12 Uhr schrieb Jonathan S. Fisher < >> > > > > exabr...@gmail.com>: >> > > > > >> > > > > > If my opinion counts for anything, I'd love for TomEE to be >> > > > > > based on >> > > > > > Apache Foundation projects as much as possible. With JPA >> > > > > > itself is >> > > > > > just a large spec to cover, I can understand OpenJPA not >> > > > > > having a >> > > > > > current spec implementation and am still thankful for the >> > > > > > past efforts >> > > > > > of the committers on that project. My second choice would be >> > > > > > EclipseLink over Hibernate, mainly because of speed, but also >> > > > > > because >> > > > > > many of the app servers in the space are already Weld + >> > > > > > Hibernate + >> > > > > > other various Redhat derivative projects. TomEE by far is >> > > > > > enormously >> > > > > > faster on startup and execution speed than OpenLiberty or >> > > > > > WildFly >> > > > > > (deploying the exact same WAR) and I'd be sad to lose that. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 9:46 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro >> > > > > > <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks Thomas for pointing this out. >> > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro >> > > > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> > > > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 4:06 PM Richard Zowalla >> > > > > > > <r...@apache.org> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Great news ;-) >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Am Montag, dem 20.11.2023 um 16:05 +0100 schrieb Thomas >> > > Andraschko: >> > > > > > > > > JFYI: https://in.relation.to/2023/11/18/license/ >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > it seems they would like to move to another license >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Am Di., 7. Feb. 2023 um 16:16 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis >> > > > > > > > > Monteiro < >> > > > > > > > > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>: >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > https://hibernate.org/community/license/ >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Most Hibernate projects are released under LGPL v2.1 >> > > > > > > > > > <https://opensource.org/licenses/LGPL-2.1>. >> > > > > > > > > > Only some sub projects are ASL v2 >> > > > > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro >> > > > > > > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> > > > > > > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 4:12 PM Thomas Andraschko < >> > > > > > > > > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > isnt hibernate licensed under Apache2.0? >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Am Di., 7. Feb. 2023 um 16:10 Uhr schrieb Swell < >> > > > > > > > > > souheil.sul...@gmail.com >> > > > > > > > > > > > : >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Because of licenses we cannot ship with >> > > > > > > > > > > > hibernate. Better >> > > be >> > > > > > > > > > éclipselink >> > > > > > > > > > > to >> > > > > > > > > > > > avoid license hell. >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue 7 Feb 2023 at 16:08, Thomas Andraschko < >> > > > > > > > > > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > AFAICS OpenJPA isnt in real active development >> > > > > > > > > > > > > and >> > > doenst >> > > > > > > > > > > > > even >> > > > > > > > > > support >> > > > > > > > > > > > all >> > > > > > > > > > > > > JPA 2.2 features. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Whats your plan for it? >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Can't we just use Hibernate as default? >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > -- >> > > > > > Jonathan | exabr...@gmail.com >> > > > > > Pessimists, see a jar as half empty. Optimists, in contrast, >> > > > > > see it as >> > > > > > half full. >> > > > > > Engineers, of course, understand the glass is twice as big as >> > > > > > it needs >> > > > to >> > > > > > be. >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> >>
