It was more or less a: if you think there is something additional to look at 
related to dependencies (CVE or critical bugs), feel free to shout out loud.

Mime4J might be a thing and has already a Jira (If I remember correctly). Boils 
down to a dependency management on our side but need to check.

Gruß
Richard 

Am 29. März 2024 13:07:14 MEZ schrieb Alex The Rocker <[email protected]>:
>Hi Richard,
>
>Maybe not fully answering your request to get dependencies analysis on
>lib/, but running latest grype led to this small finding:
>
>NAME                INSTALLED  FIXED-IN  TYPE          VULNERABILITY
>     SEVERITY
>apache-mime4j-core  0.8.7      0.8.10    java-archive
>GHSA-jw7r-rxff-gv24  Medium
>
>The use of apache-mime4j-core comes from: geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0-M1.jar
>
>This vulnerability is accociated to CVE-2024-21742 in Maven central.
>
>If not trivial to fix in 9.1.3 then I guess its medium severity
>doesn't make it vital to update.
>
>Should I check other dependencies against non-vulnerabilities related criteria 
>?
>
>Thanks,
>Alex
>
>Le ven. 29 mars 2024 à 12:44, Richard Zowalla <[email protected]> a écrit :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have nothing against doing a TomEE 9.1.3, which is merely a time
>> thing. Doing the actual release preperation, starting the vote, etc.
>> takes ~ 30-60min depending on a machine.
>>
>> If we need to do additional library upgrades, it might take some
>> additional time to wait until CI is complete and to fix potential
>> issues. Good thing is, that current CI build is happy.
>>
>> What would help to speed things up:
>>
>> Are there any additional dependencies we need to update for 9.1.3 ?
>>
>> If someone can have a quick look into /lib of a 9.1.3-SNAPSHOT, we
>> might be able to do the updates quickly and get some CI feedback, so we
>> can start with release preperations.
>>
>> Gruß
>> Richard
>>
>> Am Freitag, dem 29.03.2024 um 11:01 +0100 schrieb Alex The Rocker:
>> > Hi there,
>> >
>> > It's been more than 3 monthes since TomEE 9.1.2 was released.
>> > Couples of updates have been delivered in 9.1.3 in-work, including 2
>> > CVE fixes.
>> > Wouln't it be a good thing to release a 9.1.3 within coming weeks?
>> >
>> > (I know we would like to have 10.0.0 asap, but a small patch release
>> > on 9.2.x with depdendencies / security fixes could help keeping
>> > community users confortable with not too old versions)
>> >
>> > (my 2 cents ;)
>> >
>> > Alex
>>

Reply via email to