Awesome Richard Le mar. 2 avr. 2024, 07:59, Richard Zowalla <r...@apache.org> a écrit :
> FYI: I will open a VOTE for M1 today. > > Am Freitag, dem 29.03.2024 um 14:42 +0100 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro: > > +1 for a milestone release > > -- > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 12:58 PM Thomas Andraschko < > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Richard Zowalla <r...@apache.org> schrieb am Fr., 29. März 2024, > > > 12:50: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > just to give a short additional note here: > > > > > > > > We are currently waiting for a Johnzon 2.0.1 vote to pass [1], > > > > which I > > > > expect to be the case after Eastern has passed. > > > > > > > > If no one objects, I would like to start the process to get a > > > > milestone > > > > release out of the "main" branch rather quickly (i.e. in the > > > > upcoming > > > > week(s)) regardless of the outcome of the discussion in [2]. > > > > > > > > Are there any objections against it? > > > > > > > > Gruß > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ph2r1xkt8f5j4n9kdkoosqv3dw3chnzr > > > > [2] > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/mh36qgdph4rrlpgd48oq5cvdlqr6t12r > > > > > > > > > > > > Am Montag, dem 25.03.2024 um 10:44 +0100 schrieb Richard Zowalla: > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > > > > > Here is an update on the current progress of EE10, as the list > > > > > has > > > > > been > > > > > a bit quiet for a few weeks now due to discussions on the lists > > > > > of > > > > > our > > > > > dependencies. > > > > > > > > > > We are currently blocked by the SNAPSHOT dependency towards > > > > > BatchEE. > > > > > The good thing is that a VOTE for 1.0.4 is currently running > > > > > and will > > > > > hopefully pass in the next few days, so we can move forward on > > > > > our > > > > > side > > > > > and finally prepare a first milestone release of TomEE 10. > > > > > > > > > > # Why 1.0.4 and not 2.0.0 (as it passed the EE10 Batch TCK)? > > > > > > > > > > We have a chicken'n'egg problem on the BatchEE side with > > > > > TomEE/OpenEJB. > > > > > We cannot release BatchEE 2.0.0 without a TomEE 10 release > > > > > artifact > > > > > to > > > > > avoid dependency ona SNAPSHOT. As TomEE 10 is CDI 4, we had to > > > > > apply > > > > > a > > > > > fix in BatchEE 1.0.4 to be able to use the Jakarta relocated > > > > > BatchEE > > > > > artifact. As soon as 1.0.4 is out, I will add that + a test to > > > > > "main". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > # Next steps > > > > > > > > > > Next steps (after the milestone release) will be (and might be > > > > > a good > > > > > point for contributions): > > > > > > > > > > - Set up the remaining TCKs + signature tests inside of TomEE > > > > > - If there is enough interest, there might be potential for > > > > > synchronized (remote) sessions here to bootstrap people in > > > > > working on > > > > > it (see discussion on the user@ list) > > > > > > > > > > - Get a picture of the current TCK status > > > > > - Start filling missing pieces with code or challenge obscure > > > > > tests > > > > > ;-) > > > > > > > > > > We might also need to look into our dependencies (esp. CXF) to > > > > > see, > > > > > if > > > > > we need to shift some resources into getting CXF 4.1.x out of > > > > > the > > > > > door. > > > > > I know, that they are working hard on it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gruß > > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > > > >
