I have no preference at all as long as the minimum JDK to build stays
with 11 for main (as this is the baseline we need to adhere due to
compliance with EE10).

Gruß
Richard

Am Mittwoch, dem 03.04.2024 um 09:19 -0300 schrieb Paulo Araújo:
> Thomas,
> 
> 
> 
> Just my bean: when faced with this issue, I usually pick
> org.openjdk.nashorn:nashorn-core as dependecy to avoid any surprises.
> 
> 
> 
> Paulo.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---- Em Wed, 03 Apr 2024 07:46:04 -0300 Thomas Frühbeck
> <t.fruehb...@gmail.com> escreveu ---
> 
> 
> 
> Hi, 
>  
> currently example testing-security-4 uses default Nashorn engine,
> which 
> will is removed in since JDK15. 
> Is it acceptable  to integrate e.g. GraalVM ? 
> (this would also require at least a new property for 
> "polyglot.js.nashorn-compat") 
>  
> Any preferences/requirements? 
>  
> Thomas

Reply via email to