I have no preference at all as long as the minimum JDK to build stays with 11 for main (as this is the baseline we need to adhere due to compliance with EE10).
Gruß Richard Am Mittwoch, dem 03.04.2024 um 09:19 -0300 schrieb Paulo Araújo: > Thomas, > > > > Just my bean: when faced with this issue, I usually pick > org.openjdk.nashorn:nashorn-core as dependecy to avoid any surprises. > > > > Paulo. > > > > > > > > ---- Em Wed, 03 Apr 2024 07:46:04 -0300 Thomas Frühbeck > <t.fruehb...@gmail.com> escreveu --- > > > > Hi, > > currently example testing-security-4 uses default Nashorn engine, > which > will is removed in since JDK15. > Is it acceptable to integrate e.g. GraalVM ? > (this would also require at least a new property for > "polyglot.js.nashorn-compat") > > Any preferences/requirements? > > Thomas