(my two cents)
wouln't it be better to wait a little bit for 9.1.3 to be released, so
as to avoid releasing a Docker image with high CVEs ?

Alex

Le mar. 9 avr. 2024 à 23:50, Rod Jenkins <r...@rodandmichelle.com> a écrit :
>
> All,
>
> I was looking at the "latest" tag for the official images.  The latest tag is 
> pointed to 8.0.16-jre17-Temurim-ubuntu-webprofile.
>
> If we are going to drop TomEE 8, then I would suggest using 
> 9.1.2-jre17-Temurin-ubuntu-webprofile.
>
> Also given Temurin is the default, can we get consensus to drop Semeru?  This 
> would make a serious dent in our image count.
>
> Comment please....
>
> Thanks,
> Rod.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Rod Jenkins <r...@rodandmichelle.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 5:06 AM
> To: dev@tomee.apache.org <dev@tomee.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Drop TomEE 8.x docker images?
>
> Marcus,
>
> Thank you for the PR.  I’ll get that reviewed later today.   I agree that we 
> need to reduce the number of images.  This is something that was brought up 
> before.
>
> We should drop 8.x given its EOL.
>
> Thanks,
> Rod.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Apr 9, 2024, at 2:35 AM, Markus Jung <ju...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > I just opened a PR to add TomEE 10.0.0-M1 Dockerfiles [1], we're now at 80 
> > different variants of docker images being built for tomee:
> >
> > $ find . -name Dockerfile | wc -l
> > 80
> >
> > In the future this number could increase even more when we add docker 
> > images based on Java 21. (Depending on if we continue support for Java 11 
> > [2])
> >
> >
> > IMO we should drop Dockerfiles for TomEE  8.x, it's EOL and there really is 
> > no need to continue building docker images for it. WDYT?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > Markus
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/tomitribe/docker-tomee/pull/89
> >
> > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/4qox0vtoyv535w8cfkfqbx8swz95000q
> >

Reply via email to