(my two cents) wouln't it be better to wait a little bit for 9.1.3 to be released, so as to avoid releasing a Docker image with high CVEs ?
Alex Le mar. 9 avr. 2024 à 23:50, Rod Jenkins <r...@rodandmichelle.com> a écrit : > > All, > > I was looking at the "latest" tag for the official images. The latest tag is > pointed to 8.0.16-jre17-Temurim-ubuntu-webprofile. > > If we are going to drop TomEE 8, then I would suggest using > 9.1.2-jre17-Temurin-ubuntu-webprofile. > > Also given Temurin is the default, can we get consensus to drop Semeru? This > would make a serious dent in our image count. > > Comment please.... > > Thanks, > Rod. > > ________________________________ > From: Rod Jenkins <r...@rodandmichelle.com> > Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 5:06 AM > To: dev@tomee.apache.org <dev@tomee.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Drop TomEE 8.x docker images? > > Marcus, > > Thank you for the PR. I’ll get that reviewed later today. I agree that we > need to reduce the number of images. This is something that was brought up > before. > > We should drop 8.x given its EOL. > > Thanks, > Rod. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Apr 9, 2024, at 2:35 AM, Markus Jung <ju...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I just opened a PR to add TomEE 10.0.0-M1 Dockerfiles [1], we're now at 80 > > different variants of docker images being built for tomee: > > > > $ find . -name Dockerfile | wc -l > > 80 > > > > In the future this number could increase even more when we add docker > > images based on Java 21. (Depending on if we continue support for Java 11 > > [2]) > > > > > > IMO we should drop Dockerfiles for TomEE 8.x, it's EOL and there really is > > no need to continue building docker images for it. WDYT? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Markus > > > > [1] https://github.com/tomitribe/docker-tomee/pull/89 > > > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/4qox0vtoyv535w8cfkfqbx8swz95000q > >