Example sounds good to me. They cover a few cases, we do not have elsewhere and 
I Bet a few people like to usw TomEE with Spring.

Am 22. Oktober 2024 14:20:17 MESZ schrieb Jonathan Gallimore 
<jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>:
>I should clarify, the presence of
>
>    <dependency>
>      <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
>      <artifactId>spring-boot-starter-test</artifactId>
>      <version>3.1.11</version>
>      <scope>test</scope>
>    </dependency>
>
>Stops *all* the JAX-RS tests running. This exclude fixes it:
>
>      <dependency>
>        <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
>        <artifactId>spring-boot-starter-test</artifactId>
>        <version>3.1.11</version>
>        <scope>test</scope>
>      <exclusions>
>        <exclusion>
>          <groupId>org.junit.jupiter</groupId>
>          <artifactId>junit-jupiter</artifactId>
>        </exclusion>
>        <exclusion>
>          <groupId>org.junit.jupiter</groupId>
>          <artifactId>junit-jupiter-api</artifactId>
>        </exclusion>
>      </exclusions>
>    </dependency>
>
>but I do wonder if this is better tested in a module elsewhere (something
>like an example, maybe?). There seems to be other issues around that
>SpringWebappTest which I'm digging into.
>
>Jon
>
>On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 1:17 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
>jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Actually, TomEE 10 / main. I would like to backport that change to 9.x,
>> and understand the Java 17 issue there. I haven't tested, but I guess
>> compilation with Java 11 might also fail there (so a separate module may
>> help there too).
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 1:07 PM Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Is this about the 9.x branch? If so, the reason is, that Spring requires
>>> a Java 17 baseline.
>>>
>>> Am 22. Oktober 2024 12:06:08 MESZ schrieb Jonathan Gallimore <
>>> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>:
>>> >I've noticed that the dependencies for this test cause the test suite for
>>> >arquillian-tomee-jaxrs-tests not to run.
>>> >
>>> >Even after fixing that, it looks like there are still issues. I'm
>>> thinking
>>> >of pulling this into its own module (still under Arquillian TomEE Tests)
>>> >for anything that we might want to test with Spring.
>>> >
>>> >Any thoughts?
>>> >
>>> >Jon
>>>
>>

Reply via email to