Wow! Didn't know that. Looks like webMethods was also included in the 2.13 billion euro purchase. Missed that one.
Fingers crossed good things come to Quartz and it lasts. -David > On Jan 6, 2025, at 1:50 PM, Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback so far. > > Actually, it is now part of IBM: > > https://github.com/quartz-scheduler/quartz/issues/1134#issuecomment-2379319264 > > Quoting: > > "Yes, IBM has acquired a group of products from Software AG , of which Quartz > comes along in the collection. The past years within SAG have led to some > legal stalemates around handling contributions and other matters that stifled > progress (to be clear, no dispute of existing code IP). Once we have > IBM-sanctioned policy/procedures/re-copyrighting, etc. (e.g. for CLA/DCO, > etc.) in place we should be able to get Quartz moving again." > > Meanwhile, they have setup PR templates and co, so contributing is now rather > easy possible via GitHub. Good news for us. > > Gruß > Richard > > Am 6. Januar 2025 21:06:53 MEZ schrieb David Blevins <dblev...@tomitribe.com>: >> Great to see the activity has sustained. I had some contact with Software >> AG in 2021 trying to lobby for either renewed development or opening access >> to others. They were very responsive and cooperative. >> >> +1 for the proposal and name. A bigger thank you for addressing this. >> Given how hard I pushed, then didn't use the releases when they eventually >> started coming out... let's just say it feels good to see the debt paid to >> some level. >> >> If someone has interest in contributing to Quartz directly, let me know and >> I'll introduce you. >> >> >> -David >> >> >>> On Jan 6, 2025, at 11:19 AM, Richard Zowalla <r...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> It looks like quartz is back in the development game and we are shading a >>> rather old version of quartz as of today, so I would like to update it. >>> I found our shade on >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/deps/trunk/quartz-openejb-shade/ >>> >>> I found some reasoning for shading it in the mail archive, so I won’t touch >>> that. >>> >>> Any issues if I am going to migrate that to git / github? I would propose >>> to rename it into „tomee-quartz-shade“ though. >>> If I am not here back from you, I will assume lazy consensus on this and do >>> the migration. >>> >>> Gruß >>> Richard >>> >>> >>> >>> https://infra.apache.org/svn-to-git-migration.html >>
