Thanks Mark - I agree. I'll will deploy a SNAPSHOT, do a full build with tests and have a look at the outcome for the two other JPA impls.
OpenJPA is currently working on getting JPA 3.2 ready. Overall, CXF is also working on EE11, so might be good to start with TomEE 11 soon :) On 2025/07/16 05:35:59 Mark Struberg wrote: > you can try it out, but if there is any non-default method added to an > interface, then it will break. So not 100% sure it can be done so easily. > Otherwise let's go for it, OpenJPA supports the 3.2 API since a while afair. > LieGrue,strub > On Tuesday, 15 July 2025 at 22:17:46 CEST, Richard Zowalla > <r...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I ran some manual tests using the JPA 3.2 shade [1]. I built TomEE locally > with the updated SNAPSHOT EE API (including JPA 3.2) from [2]., added no-op > implementations for the newly introduced methods in > org.apache.openejb.persistence where needed, and tested everything with my > applications. > > Everything worked fine with both Hibernate 7.0.6 (JPA 3.2) and Hibernate > 6.6.16 (JPA 3.1), so I’m optimistic that it will also work out of the box > with OpenJPA and EclipseLink. > > To further test it, we’d need to deploy a snapshot version of the API shade > and run a full TomEE build with the changes to validate further. > > Gruß > > Richard > > [1] https://github.com/apache/tomee-jakartaee-api/tree/jpa3.2 > [2] https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/jpa3.2 > > > > Am 07.07.2025 um 16:29 schrieb Richard Zowalla <r...@apache.org>: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I've been experimenting with Hibernate 7.0.5 recently, since the 6.6.x > > (EE10) version is no longer actively maintained. > > > > As part of this, I noticed that JPA 3.2 introduces a number of new features > > and deprecations to the API (see: > > https://jakarta.ee/specifications/persistence/3.2/), though it does not > > remove any existing features. > > > > However, upgrading to Hibernate 7.x currently fails when using a JTA > > transaction type in persistence.xml, due to the following error: > > > > > > > > Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class > > org.hibernate.jpa.internal.util.PersistenceUnitTransactionTypeHelper$1 > > > > at > > org.hibernate.jpa.internal.util.PersistenceUnitTransactionTypeHelper.toNewForm(PersistenceUnitTransactionTypeHelper.java:55) > > > > at > > org.hibernate.jpa.boot.internal.PersistenceUnitInfoDescriptor.getPersistenceUnitTransactionType(PersistenceUnitInfoDescriptor.java:67) > > > > at > > org.hibernate.jpa.boot.internal.EntityManagerFactoryBuilderImpl.determineTransactionType(EntityManagerFactoryBuilderImpl.java:855) > > > > at > > org.hibernate.jpa.boot.internal.EntityManagerFactoryBuilderImpl.normalizeTransactionCoordinator(EntityManagerFactoryBuilderImpl.java:803) > > > > at > > org.hibernate.jpa.boot.internal.EntityManagerFactoryBuilderImpl.normalizeSettings(EntityManagerFactoryBuilderImpl.java:657) > > > > at > > org.hibernate.jpa.boot.internal.EntityManagerFactoryBuilderImpl.mergeSettings(EntityManagerFactoryBuilderImpl.java:592) > > > > at > > org.hibernate.jpa.boot.internal.EntityManagerFactoryBuilderImpl.<init>(EntityManagerFactoryBuilderImpl.java:224) > > > > at > > org.hibernate.jpa.boot.internal.EntityManagerFactoryBuilderImpl.<init>(EntityManagerFactoryBuilderImpl.java:173) > > > > > > To enable support for Hibernate 7 (which is quite widely adopted), I’d like > > to propose that we consider including the JPA 3.2 API in our EE API shade, > > and release a version like 10.1 (or similar). > > > > While this could potentially break signature tests in the API shade, it > > would unblock users who want to adopt Hibernate 7 today. > > > > I’d love to get your thoughts on whether this is a direction we want to > > pursue. > > > > Gruß > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > (Side note: we could start moving toward TomEE 11, but progress there is > > currently blocked due to CXF not being EE11-ready yet.) > > > > > >
