+ 1 vote to use Hibernate insted of Open Jpa. I have never used OpenJpa. I have been using Hibernate since 2.006.
Evaldo Junior Em sex, 26 de set de 2025 10:18, Thomas Andraschko < [email protected]> escreveu: > +1 for hibernate + hibernate for Jakarta data > > Daniel Dias Dos Santos <[email protected]> schrieb am Fr., > 26. Sept. 2025, 14:34: > > > Hello, > > > > I vote +1 to make Hibernate the default in TomEE. > > > > Honestly, I have never used OpenJPA. > > > > And most developers use Hibernate. > > > > Since it is already under the Apache license, I believe it would be a > huge > > gain for the project, as it has a strong community around it and is > already > > implementing Jakarta Data. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2025, 05:29 Richard Zowalla <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I’d like to start a discussion about the future of OpenJPA in TomEE, > > > specifically whether it’s time to consider replacing it with Hibernate. > > > > > > Hibernate 7 is now ASLv2 licensed, fully implements the latest spec > > > features, and already supports Jakarta Data for EE 11. This puts it in > a > > > strong position to meet our needs moving forward, especially as we look > > > toward TomEE 11. > > > > > > By contrast, OpenJPA has struggled to keep up, and realistically we > don’t > > > appear to have enough development resources to build and maintain an > > > ASF-only implementation of Jakarta Data. In fact, we made a similar > > > decision when we gave up the ASF-only spec implementations some time > ago. > > > > > > Of course, anyone who prefers to stay with OpenJPA can still swap it > in, > > > but from my perspective, I believe we should seriously consider whether > > > Hibernate should become the default going forward. > > > > > > I’d like to hear your thoughts, both on the practical implications for > > > TomEE and the overall direction we should take. > > > > > > Gruß > > > > > > Richard > > >
