Hi Jonathan,

Accroding to Mark ( 
https://lists.apache.org/thread/lq9zvgvt5gsvj76cmv8fwddq60k935yv ) it is just a 
matter of fixing the remaining TCK errors ;-)
The current work is on the cdi-4.1 branch in OWB.

Gruß
Richard

> Am 12.04.2026 um 15:45 schrieb Jonathan S. Fisher <[email protected]>:
> 
> Richard, on CDI/OWB, what specifically could use some work? I <3 cdi,
> wouldn't mind throwing something that way.
> 
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2026 at 4:49 AM Richard Zowalla <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hey everyone,
>> 
>> I wanted to give another quick update on the current progress of the
>> Jakarta EE 11 work on TomEE.
>> 
>> Jakarta Data 1.0 has been integrated. Our implementation can be
>> deactivated if you prefer to use the Jakarta Data implementation provided
>> by Hibernate. That said, you can also use our implementation alongside
>> Hibernate, so you have the flexibility to choose what works best for your
>> setup. Feel free to try it (with a TomEE 11 snapshot) and report back, if
>> you find issues ;-)
>> 
>> Jakarta Security: The Security TCK is up as a PR:
>> https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/2579 - feedback is very welcome.
>> Some of the tests are already passing, but as expected it still needs work
>> since we hadn't started on it before. The actual Security implementation
>> for EE 11 is still missing, but now that we have the TCK in place, we can
>> start tackling that soon.
>> 
>> REST (CXF): Markus did some work on the REST TCK and submitted a PR to
>> CXF. This will likely require another CXF release to pick up those changes.
>> 
>> CDI (OWB): OpenWebBeans is still a work in progress and needs some love on
>> the CDI 4.1 branch:
>> https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/commits/cdi-4.1/ - if someone
>> wants to jump in, contributions are very welcome.
>> 
>> Concurrency 3.1 is up as a PR with a passing TCK:
>> https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/2577 -  feedback is welcome here as
>> well.
>> 
>> JPA 3.2 (OpenJPA): There is an open PR that passes the JPA 3.2 TCK (with
>> PostgreSQL) and implements the missing features in OpenJPA. However, the PR
>> still needs some more love, in particular, the MariaDB/MySQL code paths
>> need to be adjusted. See https://github.com/apache/openjpa/pull/142 -
>> Help with fixing and/or reviewing would definitely be welcomed by the
>> OpenJPA folks
>> 
>> So far so good from my side.
>> 
>> Richard
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jonathan | [email protected]
> Pessimists, see a jar as half empty. Optimists, in contrast, see it as half
> full.
> Engineers, of course, understand the glass is twice as big as it needs to
> be.

Reply via email to