Jörg Jahnke wrote: > Secondly there is a maximum number of ordinals per def file which we > might hit.
That can easily be solved by cutting down the libraries. That's needed for the biggest ones anyway. :-) > According to the Wiki entry on DLLs > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic-link_library>, the overhead for > name lookup was much higher during old 16-bit Windows times, when the > name table was not sorted by name. With 32-bit Windows it is now sorted > by name, so that a binary search can be implemented, which leads to much > better results. Additionally the (small) performance penalty only occurs > once when a DLL is loaded. So in short words: whether we can use that depends on how much it badly influences startup performance. Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
