I believe the version should have "incubating" within it. -- Hitesh
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Great, thank you. > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I just changed everything to use toree again. >_> > > > > https://pypi.python.org/pypi?:action=display&name=toree&version=0.1.0 > > > > I can delete this and undo all of it so we can use apache-toree if that's > > what you'd rather do. > > > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 2:24 PM Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Just to clarify, we are going to upload: > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/toree/ > >> 0.1.0-incubating/toree-pip/ > >> > >> > >> I don't have strong opinions for the name, "apache-toree" is even better > >> than just toree... but we will need to update docs and other stuff, > right ? > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Chip Senkbeil < > chip.senkb...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> It looks like all of our makefile work was updated awhile ago to use > >>> apache-toree. This must have been from an earlier conversation. I can > >>> update our release artifacts for pip to use toree, but we'll have to go > >>> through the makefile and update it to produce toree in the future if > that's > >>> the route we want to go. > >>> > >>> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:27 PM Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I looked into some other Apache projects, I believe we could follow > the > >>>> same pattern and use "toree". but describe it as "Apache Toree > >>>> (incubating)". in the description field. > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Chip Senkbeil < > chip.senkb...@gmail.com > >>>> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> What is the exact name that you want for the release? > >>>>> > >>>>> Previously, we were using just "toree", but do you want > "apache-toree" > >>>>> or "apache-toree-incubating"? > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:47 AM Luciano Resende < > luckbr1...@gmail.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Chip Senkbeil < > >>>>>> chip.senkb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I've gotten mixed messages regarding where the pip artifacts should > >>>>>>> go. Originally, we were going to publish them on > >>>>>>> https://pypi.python.org/pypi (which we were previously doing for > >>>>>>> dev snapshots), but there has been some issues with hosting > externally from > >>>>>>> Apache? Is that still the case? Can we host official releases on > Pypi? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Official releases are ok to go there. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> If not, we can just indicate that they install via `pip install > >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/toree/0.1.0- > >>>>>>> incubating/toree-pip/apache-toree-0.1.0.tar.gz` or whatever the > >>>>>>> command is that Gino was mentioning. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> If we want and are allowed to publish on Pypi, I'll do that soon. > >>>>>>> Just let me know. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> Yes, please. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Luciano Resende > >>>>>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > >>>>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Luciano Resende > >>>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > >>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Luciano Resende > >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > >> > > > > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
