Hey Sergey- What is the problem that you are experiencing here? I understand what you are proposing, but am not sure why this is needed. I would find some more details very useful
Thanks, Eric > On Jun 5, 2018, at 5:40 PM, Dremin, Sergey <[email protected]> wrote: > > We should create an extension to the deep caching/deep routing field that > will allow you to specify a minimum # of caches in a deep cache group for > that deep cache group to be enabled for that DS. > > > > Cache group size is proportional to caching efficiency. Having a configurable > value for a minimum # of caches for a DS would allow to change the caching > efficiency for that DS versus the routing efficiency (that comes with deep > routing) for that DS. > > > > Ideally this is something that is set based on current CDN performance. > > > > 1. A deep routing enabled DS with poor caching efficiency could use a > bigger minimum size for a deep cache group. > 2. A deep routing enabled DS with not sufficient deep routing usage, could > use a smaller minimum size for a deep cache group. > > > > Right now, we need to decide if we want to make this configurable or static. > Since I think this will need to be configurable in the future anyway, so it a > good idea to do it now. > > > > This will require changes to TO/TP and traffic router. > > Thoughts?
