the portal (and any other clients using API 1.x) would remain on 1.x using
ids until ready to take advantage of the cleaner 2.x with no ids...


On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 2:44 PM Jeremy Mitchell <[email protected]>
wrote:

> sure but not exactly a small effort as you'd have to fix every part of TP
> that currently passes ID's to the 1.x api but i do think it would make a
> much better api.
>
> also, api 2.x should support patch imo.
>
> https://www.mnot.net/blog/2012/09/05/patch
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 8:22 AM Dewayne Richardson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1, but we need to consider it as an interim step, I think we need to
> also
> > start considering rethinking the API from the top-down (leaving the ID
> > based API's behind where possible).
> >
> > -Dew
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 3:44 PM Dan Kirkwood <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all..    we've discussed the possibility of moving the major version
> > of
> > > the Traffic Ops API at some point in the (hopefully near) future.
>  When
> > > that does happen,  I'd like to propose that the change include
> > elimination
> > > of using foreign key ids (from the "id" field) and instead reference
> > using
> > > a different unique key.
> > >
> > > Most tables have such a unique key: name, username, hostname, etc, and
> > the
> > > API should be able to be upgraded to handle most cases fairly easily.
> > >
> > > Of course, more details would need to be worked out including
> maintaining
> > > an upgrade path and ensuring no functionality is lost,  but wanted to
> get
> > > the idea out there for discussion.
> > >
> > > thanks..   Dan
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to