Agreed -- we need visibility in dev efforts earlier rather than later.
 Saying the PR must be complete before submitting may be counter productive.

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 8:33 PM Jeremy Mitchell <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Like Dave said, I often request WIP PR's especially when trying to work
> thru requirements and/or design.
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 7:04 PM Dave Neuman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > We encourage WIP pull requests and a feature shouldn’t have to be
> complete
> > before you open one.   With that being said, I am not sure that we have
> any
> > fine grained control over that bot.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 17:06 Gray, Jonathan <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Today we use this plugin to achieve asfgit interaction:
> > > https://github.com/jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin
> > >
> > > I don't believe what you want is expressible and instead should wait to
> > > open your PR until you're done.
> > >
> > > Jonathan G
> > >
> > > On 10/25/18, 3:47 PM, "Moltzau, Matthew" <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >     Is it possible to configure the asfgit bot to not automatically run
> > > tests on every push?
> > >     Not sure if this is just me, but a lot of times I tend to push
> > > multiple times before tests
> > >     really need to be run. Sometimes I do a quick fixup and push after
> an
> > > initial push, which
> > >     triggers two test jobs. Or I might forget about a second commit I
> > need
> > > to also push since I
> > >     have a ‘commit and push’ mentality.
> > >     Thoughts? +1/-1?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to