3.0 has already been released and any changes to 3.0 will go into the 3.0.x branch. Same for 3.0.1 - that release will come off the 3.0.x branch as well.
The next release off the master branch will be either 3.1 or 4.0 depending on the decision of the community in declaring a new major version. Unless that decision gets made, I think its reasonable to treat master as 3.1. If we do decide the next release is 4.0, there would be some work to go update version numbers- I’m just assuming minor releases are more common than major releases —Eric > On Apr 12, 2019, at 2:33 PM, Fieck, Brennan <[email protected]> wrote: > > So I'm confused. I've heard conflicting answers to this question: If I add > something to Master, in what version should the documentation say it was > added? > > > The ones that make sense to me: > * 4.0.0 (someone said this was what master is tracking now) > * 3.1.0 (someone ELSE stated it was this) > * 3.0.1 (current latest revision - though not released yet) > * 3.0.0 (current contents of the VERSION file at the repository's root) >
