Does this mean the site can list 4.1.1 again at
https://trafficcontrol.apache.org/releases ?

-Zach

On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 2:38 PM ocket 8888 <[email protected]> wrote:

> should be done, now
>
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 12:48 PM ocket 8888 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Oh, it's still in the repos somewhere, then. Good. Yeah, I can re-add
> that
> > everywhere
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 1, 2021, 12:45 Zach Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Why not? Can't it be re-added to the SVN repo? Files to re-add are in
> >>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/!svn/rvr/44846/release/trafficcontrol/4.1.1/
> >>
> >> -Zach
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 12:10 PM ocket 8888 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Alright. If " 4.1.1 isn't available at
> >> > https://downloads.apache.org/trafficcontrol"; then idk if we can put
> it
> >> > back
> >> > up on the website, but I could add some RPMs to the release on GH?
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 1:29 PM Zach Hoffman <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Updated
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TC/Release+Management+Process#ReleaseManagementProcess-FinalizingaRelease
> >> > > and changed
> >> > >
> >> > > You will want to remove the earliest release as only two releases
> >> should
> >> > be
> >> > > listed here.
> >> > >
> >> > > to
> >> > >
> >> > > You will want to remove any releases whose branches are no longer
> >> under
> >> > > development (supported by the ATC security policy).
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > -Zach
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 1:16 PM ocket 8888 <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > That sounds great to me
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021, 13:01 Zach Hoffman <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > IMO our release management page should be updated to reflect the
> >> > Apache
> >> > > > > release distribution policy. From
> >> > > > > https://infra.apache.org/release-distribution.html#archival:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Each project's distribution directory *should* contain the
> latest
> >> > > release
> >> > > > > in each branch that is currently under development. When
> >> development
> >> > > > ceases
> >> > > > > on a version branch, releases of that branch *should* be
> removed.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > -Zach
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 12:53 PM ocket 8888 <
> [email protected]>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > There's conflicting information in the release management page
> >> in
> >> > the
> >> > > > > wiki:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > ... remove the earliest release as only two releases should
> be
> >> > > listed
> >> > > > > > here [in the releases repository]
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > is in the steps for finalizing a release, but
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Generally, we support the latest minor version of the latest
> >> two
> >> > > > major
> >> > > > > > versions.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > is under the section for updating the security policy.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 9:34 AM Zach Hoffman <
> >> [email protected]
> >> > >
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Apache Traffic Control 4.1.1 isn't available at
> >> > > > > > > https://downloads.apache.org/trafficcontrol/ and there's no
> >> > > mention
> >> > > > of
> >> > > > > > it
> >> > > > > > > on https://trafficcontrol.apache.org/releases/ , but
> >> according
> >> > to
> >> > > > our
> >> > > > > > > security policy (
> >> > > > > > >
> >> https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/blob/master/SECURITY.md
> >> > > ),
> >> > > > > > 4.1.x
> >> > > > > > > and 5.1.x are our 2 supported versions.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > As a side note, 5.0.0 is available on
> >> > > > > > > https://downloads.apache.org/trafficcontrol/ and
> >> > > > > > > https://trafficcontrol.apache.org/releases/ , yet our
> >> security
> >> > > > policy
> >> > > > > > > lists
> >> > > > > > > 5.0.x as unsupported.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > -Zach
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to