+1 I still don't like using Slack for open-source projects - because it's closed-source and not feature-rich enough to overlook that fact, IMO - but this move represents a definite improvement over the current situation.
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:51 AM Jeremy Mitchell <mitchell...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm all for moving to ASF slack > > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:35 AM Dave Neuman <neu...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I don't think we have any more good reasons to stay on a standalone > slack. > > We do have about 700 users in our current slack and I doubt we get them > all > > to move, but I suppose all of the active folks would move. > > > > > > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 9:14 AM Zach Hoffman <zrhoff...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > Hi ATC, > > > > > > The official Apache Software Foundation slack ( > > https://the-asf.slack.com/ > > > , > > > invite at https://s.apache.org/slack-invite ) did not exist when > > > https://traffic-control-cdn.slack.com/ was made. It's on an enterprise > > > plan, so it does not face the limitations that our Slack workspace > faces, > > > such as only being able to see the last 10,000 messages, only being > able > > to > > > add 10 bots, etc. > > > > > > ASF Infra has added a webhook for the repo's commit activity to be > posted > > > to #traffic-control-commits in the ASF slack, and we can add as many > > > channels as we want. Any reason not to switch? > > > > > > -Zach > > > > > >
