1. Attendance - Matt Jackson - Rawlin Peters - Zach Hoffman - Taylor Frey - Jeremy Mitchell 2. Will we remove Riak as a Traffic Vault backend? - Yes, it's already deprecated, so we can remove it with ATCv7.0.0 - The transition is fairly simple. - The TO API endpoints specific to Riak are all either deprecated or removed already 3. What will it take to start using versioned module paths to lock down dependency versions? - People can't import our clients without using exact commit hashes - Go team says "if you don't like it, don't use `go`" - require e.g. Bazel for building? - Possible strategy is to use "module-specific" tags - e.g. v1.7.0-0 for version 7.0.0 4. Mailing List Thread: GH issue labels to help determine priority 5. Can we add some "impact" and "effort" labels to our tech debt items to help people prioritize them? - #5772 Added "low effort" - #5076 Added "low effort" - #4800 Added "low effort" - #4428 Added "low effort" - #4427 Added "low effort" - #4411 Added "low effort" - #4324 Added "low effort" - #4311 Asked reporter if this issue can be closed now that ORT perl script is removed - #4122 Added "low effort" - #4025 Added "low effort" - #3968 Added "low effort" - #3721 Added "low effort" - #3791 Added "low effort" - #3288 Added "high effort" label - #2827 Added "low effort" - #2809 Added "low effort" - #2727 Asked if this is a duplicate of #3288 2669 - #2558 Closed - #2546 Asked if this is still applicable - #1018 Added "low effort" - #979 Added "low effort"
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 9:18 AM Jeremy Mitchell <mitchell...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Can we add some "impact" and "effort" labels to our tech debt items to help > people prioritize them? > https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22tech+debt%22 > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 9:09 AM Jeremy Mitchell <mitchell...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Do we plan to remove Riak as an option for Traffic Vault now that Postgres > > TV is available? > > > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:16 AM ocket 8888 <ocket8...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> If you have anything you want to discuss at next week's meeting, > >> respond to this email and it's on the agenda > >> > >
