Let's backport Rocky to 6.1.x -Zach
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 10:16 AM ocket 8888 <[email protected]> wrote: > > CiaB is explicitly not meant to be a real production deployment option > - if that's the *only* thing that's broken I don't think it warrants > backports. But I would imagine there are other issues as well. > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 10:14 AM Eric Friedrich <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hey- > > Thoughts on backporting the Rocky Linux fixes to the 6.x branch? > > Currently CIAB is broken on that branch and it is our current "stable" > > release > > > > --Eric
