0. Due to scheduling conflicts, this meeting was pushed to 2022-08-09
1. Attendance
    - Stephen Hamrick
    - Zach Hoffman
    - Srijeet Chatterjee
    - Eric Holguin
    - Joshua Zenn
    - Taylor Frey
    - Ashish Paudyal
2. Do we want to support Swagger in the TO API?
    - Tabled because the person who was asking about isn't around to
extoll its virtue
    - Could be very complex, we should announce a depreciation to
force people to speak up in its defense.
3. Using the EPEL Traffic Server RPM is not supported
    - Evan's working on it
    - biggest issue is the /opt/trafficserver installation prefix.
    - #6871 tracks the problem
4. ML: 7.0.0 is approved
    - Official release announcement expected today
5. ML: TC changelog
    - It's probably better to add tags to change-log lines instead of
splitting by component, to avoid duplicates
    - a GHA could be written to suggest to people what to use for tags
    - Needs Mailing list decision

On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 9:26 AM Zach Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Consider discussion:
> - Do we want to support Swagger in the Traffic Ops API?
> - Using the EPEL Traffic Server RPM is not supported (
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/issues/6871__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!G-CdXfrF3I17BtsU8Med_x_aEME5X6Od2mSugAvD8euQrwHTRbSLdvQ57fq3LZ3NSuHhoIf7qpUj2osFZnMB$
>  )
>
> Active mailing list threads:
> - [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 7.0.0-RC2 <
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.apache.org/thread/oc6t7grh1sk40ck95mtyxmk3f53fdvps__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!G-CdXfrF3I17BtsU8Med_x_aEME5X6Od2mSugAvD8euQrwHTRbSLdvQ57fq3LZ3NSuHhoIf7qpUj2jC-x1VR$
>  >
> - TC change log <
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.apache.org/thread/93k7qkr54kjyt43c8y5p686wv0b2t7r6__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!G-CdXfrF3I17BtsU8Med_x_aEME5X6Od2mSugAvD8euQrwHTRbSLdvQ57fq3LZ3NSuHhoIf7qpUj2jsyLLyr$
>  >
>
> -ach
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 10:17 AM ocket 8888 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > If you have anything you want to discuss at next week's meeting
> > respond to this email and it's on the agenda.
> >

Reply via email to