Sounds good On 2023/01/26 04:44:34 ocket 8888 wrote: > Sounds like a plan. As opposed to starting next week - as was previously > the plan - some people who wanted to attend informed me of a biweekly > conflict, so I'm staggering the meetings. > > All that to say: our first meeting on the new biweekly cadence will be on > February 8th. > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 9:35 AM Zach Hoffman <zr...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1 for changing it. Working group meetings were originally once a month. 1 > > week seems a little frequent, but 2 weeks seems just right. > > > > -Zach > > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 2:44 PM Steve Hamrick <sh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > I'm +1 on changing it. Worst case we can always switch back. > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 9:51 AM ocket 8888 <oc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > It's been proposed that we move the weekly TC WG meetings to a > > bi-weekly > > > > cadence. I'd like to take a vote to see how people feel about that. > > > > > > > > Personally I'm -0. Weekly will make me feel more important because I > > > have a > > > > meeting to run more often. But actually it doesn't really matter either > > > > way. So at the moment from a quick poll in the WG huddle, we are at +1 > > in > > > > favor of bi-weekly atm. > > > > > >
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
