+1

Verified hashes and signature.
RPMs built

--Eric

On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 1:33 PM Jeremy Mitchell <mitchell...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 11:09 AM Rima Shah <rs...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Corrected top link.
> >
> >  I've prepared a release for 8.0.0-RC5.
> >
> > Changes since RELEASE-8.0.0-RC4:
> > https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/compare/v8.0.0-rc4...v8.0.0-rc5
> >
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/blob/RELEASE-8.0.0-RC5/CHANGELOG.md
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rima Shah
> >
> > On 2024/01/17 17:48:56 R S wrote:
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > > I've prepared a release for 8.0.0-RC5. Changes since RELEASE-8.0.0-RC4:
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/compare/v8.0.0-rc4...v8.0.0-rc5
> > >  <
> >
> https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/blob/RELEASE-8.0.0-RC4/CHANGELOG.md
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/blob/RELEASE-8.0.0-RC5/CHANGELOG.md
> > >
> > > The artifacts are available for download at:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/trafficcontrol/8.0.0/RC5/
> > >
> > > BLAKE2 checksum:
> > >
> > >
> >
> a2d12fa11050e20b7ab4c864a058de2781af4a1449e62c5d3cc169fcd6c8bb88dd9f065a2a44d93ed6f64b00802aa0c387f997c7dea0e7331e4b8397022caa68
> > >
> > > SHA512 checksum:
> > >
> > >
> >
> cb826938cdf23e053326f5b0de0cea36de8d3825c5803392a1ba1cb8406a753c6d523e2662cc82ac33181a7f295ca7b74c8e72ebe848e64ae4ad3d5a67872667
> > >
> > > This corresponds to git refs:
> > >
> > >       Hash:0c515199dbeb3233b32376268e4ee32ad18ebd8b
> > >       Tag: RELEASE-8.0.0-RC5
> > >
> > > Which can be verified with the following command:
> > >
> > >       $ git tag -v RELEASE-8.0.0-RC5
> > >
> > > All code signing keys are available here:
> > >
> > >       https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/trafficcontrol/KEYS
> > >
> > > Make sure you refresh from a key server to get all relevant signatures.
> > >
> > > The vote is open until 22:00 UTC on Monday, Jan 22nd 2024 and passes
> > > if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > >       [ ] +1 approve
> > >       [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >       [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Rima Shah
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to