> On Dec 1, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Phil Sorber <sor...@apache.org> wrote: > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#basic-facts > > Missing checksums for the artifacts. > > And for the record, I am still not liking the RPM's as release artifacts, > but I'll let the IPMC weigh in on that.
If I had a vote, now that you have the tar-ball, I’d ditch all he RPMs. If someone needs the RPMs, make a Makefile target such that someone can produce those source RPMs (shouldn’t they be .srpm) from the tar-ball. Cheers, — Leif
