Agree, I also believe the CCR profile <> deliveryservice mapping is superfluous, now that there is a link from cdn <> deliveryservice. This was discussed when the 'cdn' table was being implemented, but perhaps too late into the implementation phase. Further, I also agree that the domain_name parameter should be moved to the 'cdn' table, or its own table entirely, with a link to the 'cdn' table.
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Jan van Doorn <j...@knutsel.com> wrote: > Looking at the ATS 6.2 support for TO which requires a deliveryservice to > profile mapping, and was wondering why we still have the profile column > (CCR Profile) in deliveryservice? > > At first glance it seems to be used for the domain_name parameter only > (?), and that could (should?) be moved to the cdn table? Not sure if this > was considered when the cdn table was added and decided against for a good > reason? > > Cheers, > JvD > >
