You mean we should have deliveryservice <-> parameter directly and not deliveryservice <-> profile <-> parameter ?
I think I like using a profile here better. I could see how a set of these setting could be re-used over and over again, like a template? Rgds, JvD > On Dec 26, 2016, at 09:21, Mark Torluemke <mtorlue...@apache.org> wrote: > > Spawning a different email thread from Jan's original for the topic in the > edited subject line. > > Thanks, > Mark > > On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Jan van Doorn <j...@knutsel.com> wrote: > >> Looking at the ATS 6.2 support for TO which requires a deliveryservice to >> profile mapping, and was wondering why we still have the profile column >> (CCR Profile) in deliveryservice? >> > > Feels like Delivery Services should get Parameters (in the same way > Profiles and Cache Groups have them) to support the multi-site origin > concepts. Maybe just a typo above? > > >> >> At first glance it seems to be used for the domain_name parameter only >> (?), and that could (should?) be moved to the cdn table? Not sure if this >> was considered when the cdn table was added and decided against for a good >> reason? >> >> Cheers, >> JvD >> >>
