+0 on both. I don't think the security issues are significant. But, it doesn't ever hurt to release.
On Aug 30, 2010, at 4:48 PM, John Plevyak wrote: > > +1 for 2.0.1 > +1 for 2.1.2 > > john > > > On 8/30/2010 1:00 PM, Eric Balsa wrote: >> +1 for 2.0.1 >> +1 for 2.1.2 >> >> --Eric >> >> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Leif Hedstrom <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 08/26/2010 10:25 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I've prepared a new package for a v2.0.1 release. Please take a look at >>>> the artifacts, check the STATUS/README/CHANGES files, and do builds and >>>> tests. After finishing your examination of the release candidate, please >>>> cast your +/-/0 votes, I will call the vote on 8/30. The src tar-ball and >>>> signatures are available in >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/rel-candidates/ >>>> >>> >>> >>> Hmmm, please vote on these releases. If not, I guess the consensus is that >>> we shouldn't make these releases (then I'll just call it tonight and cancel >>> the releases). >>> >>> If there are concerns about the default for the new setting (to compare the >>> names on DNS lookups), please voice them and I'll start a new package / >>> release process (and vote). >>> >>> -- leif >>> >>> > -- Theo Schlossnagle http://omniti.com/is/theo-schlossnagle
