The minimum version of any dependent package is (currently) what RHEL5 
provides. We could simply list those I think?

-- Leif 



> On Sep 21, 2014, at 6:23 PM, Brian Geffon <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> This is something that apparently has never been brought up, we don't have
> a strict OpenSSL minimum version. By explicitly stating our minimum
> supported OpenSSL version we can clean up our SSL code, specifically around
> the SNI #ifdefs. I'm going to propose that we make *0.9.8f* our minimum
> supported version. This was the first version to support SNI and was
> released in late 2007 (around 7 years ago). It seems like a good place to
> start. Thoughts?
> 
> Brian

Reply via email to