Good feedback... I'll address that
On Monday, November 3, 2014 9:56 AM, James Peach <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2014, at 8:46 AM, Joshua Blatt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
> The clouds have parted and I have time to return to the functional test
> framework. I'm thinking for starters I'll transcode the nodejs impl at
> apache/trafficserver into python, then see how well it fares reproducing a
> few open issues we know about. If anyone would like to discuss this, please
> let me know.
Hi Josh,
I did review your prototype on github. The main thing that struck me was the
duplication of entire ATS configurations. IMHO this is a non-starter. Tests
should either declare the settings they need, or use convenience API to make
(synchronous) configuration changes. In general, we should prefer succinct,
declarative configurations for tests.
> Thanks,
> Josh
>
>
> | |
> | | | | | | | |
> | apache/trafficserverHi guys, This is a first stab at a functional test
> framework. My intention is to stimulate discussion for the test framework
> talk at the ATS Summit. I won't be shat... |
> | |
> | View on github.com | Preview by Yahoo |
> | |
> | |
>
>
