The jenkins jobs have expired from the server, but I thought the build issues were resolved, but the python installer did not work on the centos7 test VMs (for an unidentified reason).
--Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: Liu, Ming (Ming) <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, August 31, 2018 10:50 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] gcc compiler support > > The RH7 build failed because Maven to download some dependencies. I > have tried many times, but still cannot resolve the issue. > Once the build is OK, there will be regression issues in UDR tests, I was > suggesting to remove the failed UDR test first. But the Maven issue blocked > me until now. > I can make build with my own RH7 workstation, but just cannot make the > Jenkins make a successful build. > > Ming > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sean Broeder <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2018 5:05 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] gcc compiler support > > Right, so we don't currently support RH7 nor gcc 5.x.x as Selva pointed out. > > The systems I've seen have gcc 4.4.7 and I know that has been tested > regularly. Steve may know of others that are supported. > > Thanks, > Sean > > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Varnau <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 1:58 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] gcc compiler support > > No, not resolved. The PR that enables the RH7 testing is: > https://github.com/apache/trafodion/pull/1565 > > --Steve > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Selva Govindarajan <[email protected]> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 1:52 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] gcc compiler support > > > > Trafodon should be able to build with gcc 4.8.5 which is the default gcc > > version on RH7. Earlier voting indicated that he/she is unable to bring up > > Trafodion after building with 4.8.5 and the build failed on gcc 5.x.x > > version. > > Usually, it is cumbersome to switch to a different gcc version than what > > comes default in the redhat release. So, it is not clear whether he/she > tried > > bringing up on RH7 or RH6. There has been some discussion earlier if > > Trafodion needs to be validated on RH7 on a daily basis. I believe the > > issues > > prevented to do daily build has been resolved. But, I am not sure which > > release path it is in 2.3.0 or 2.4.0. > > > > Selva > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sandhya Sundaresan <[email protected]> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 1:30 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] gcc compiler support > > > > Here is one : > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRAFODION-1868 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dave Birdsall <[email protected]> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 12:02 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] gcc compiler support > > > > Hi, > > > > I dimly remember that someone was playing with moving to 4.8.5... so > there > > might be a JIRA already. But I don't remember who. > > > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sean Broeder <[email protected]> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 11:58 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [DISCUSS] gcc compiler support > > > > Hi All, > > During the current vote for the 2.3.0 release of Trafodion it was pointed > > out > > that using gcc compiler version 4.8.5 would result in build errors. > > I've looked around and I cannot find any documentation indicating which > > compiler versions are supported, however, it appears the version that gets > > used most prominently on the systems I've seen is version 4.4.7. > > > > While I think it is a good idea to move forward with a newer compiler, this > > change is not without risk and could result in a variety of other errors > > that > are > > not yet known. > > > > Therefore, at this stage of the release, I would like to propose we open a > > JIRA to move to a newer compiler version that could be tested on the main > > branch during the next release cycle and list gcc compiler 4.4.7 as a build > > requirement. > > > > Opinions? > > > > Thanks, > > Sean
