The new JDBC reference guide? Should we go ahead and pull that into release2.0 branch?
Either way it will make it to the web site, but if we need to make 2.0 updates versus 2.1 updates, it would be better to have on release2.0 branch, yes? --Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: Gunnar Tapper [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 6:49 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Release 2.0 packaging - docs > > Yep. The pending documentation pull request doesn't matter much, does it? > > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Roberta Marton > <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I would include them. You are correct about release 1.3. > > > > Roberta > > On May 4, 2016 4:06 PM, "Steve Varnau" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Roberta, Gunnar, (and anyone else who cares), > > > > > > > > > > > > I was generating source package for the release, and found that we are > > > excluding some doc directories. The comment in the .gitattributes > > > file > > > says: > > > > > > > > > > > > Remove documentation until until our generation code is available > > > > > > > > > > > > I take it the concern in 1.3 time frame was that docs were out of > > > synch > > > with rest of the code. But now I think we should be including all the > > docs > > > with the release, yes? > > > > > > > > > > > > --Steve > > > > > > > > > -- > Thanks, > > Gunnar > *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.*
