Curious.  Will the meta-data versions for EsgynDB and TrafodionDB will
evolve on their own?

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Anoop Sharma <[email protected]>
wrote:

> yes, that comment refers to the older metadata version.
>
> We can remove that comment and refer to the version
> enum in CmpSeabaseDDLincludes.h.  That enum will
> always contain correct old/new metadata versions.
>
> This is the content of that file (comment is correct there):
>
> // new metadata version 1.1.0 changed for release 1.1.0.
> // Old metadata version 3.0.
> enum {
>   METADATA_MAJOR_VERSION = 1,
>   METADATA_OLD_MAJOR_VERSION = 3,
>   METADATA_MINOR_VERSION = 1,
>   METADATA_UPDATE_VERSION = 0,
>   METADATA_OLD_MINOR_VERSION = 0,
>   METADATA_OLD_UPDATE_VERSION = 0,
>   DATAFORMAT_MAJOR_VERSION = 1,
>   DATAFORMAT_MINOR_VERSION = 1
> };
> anoop
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Birdsall [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 9:31 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Trafodion 2.1 metadata changes
>
> Hi Anoop,
>
> Thanks. I saw 2.3 here:
>
>
> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> // *** Current Definition ***
> //
> // Current metadata tables definition for Metadata Version 2.3 //  (Major
> version = 2, Minor version = 3)
>
> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>
> This is in the current version of sqlcomp/CmpSeabaseDDLmd.h.
>
> I'm guessing this is simply a matter of the comments being out-of-date?
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anoop Sharma [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 9:27 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Trafodion 2.1 metadata changes
>
> Dave, on version numbering.
> Where do you see major version of 2 and minor version of 3?
> Current metadata major/minor version is 1/1 as defined in the following
> enum.
> It might be good to match metadata version number to the release number. So
> changed metadata major/minor version will be 2/1. That will tell which
> release metadata version changed.
>
> enum {
>   METADATA_MAJOR_VERSION = 1,
>   METADATA_OLD_MAJOR_VERSION = 3,
>   METADATA_MINOR_VERSION = 1,
>   METADATA_UPDATE_VERSION = 0,
>   METADATA_OLD_MINOR_VERSION = 0,
>   METADATA_OLD_UPDATE_VERSION = 0,
>   DATAFORMAT_MAJOR_VERSION = 1,
>   DATAFORMAT_MINOR_VERSION = 1
> };
>
>
> Apache Trafodion Conversational Interface 2.1.0 Copyright (c) 2015-2016
> Apache Software Foundation
> >>get version of metadata;
>
>   Current Version 1.1.0. Expected Version 1.1.0.
>   Metadata is current.
>
> --- SQL operation complete.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Birdsall [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 9:22 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Trafodion 2.1 metadata changes
>
> Thanks, Roberta. Will look into it.
>
> Just curious: What happens in release 2.0 if library management has not
> been
> added? And is it possible to "un-add" it?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roberta Marton [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 9:19 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Trafodion 2.1 metadata changes
>
> In release 2.0 we added library management and we did not support an
> upgrade
> operation.
> So, you may want to check to see if library management has been added, if
> not add it.
> The command to add library management is "initialize trafodion, create
> library management"
>
>    Roberta
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Birdsall [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 9:09 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Trafodion 2.1 metadata changes
>
> Hi Trafodion developers,
>
>
>
> So far I know of the following metadata changes for Trafodion 2.1.
>
>
>
> 1.       I want to add an index to TABLE_CONSTRAINTS to improve DDL
> concurrency (JIRA TRAFODION-2037)
>
> 2.       Anu wishes to add a couple of columns to one of the Repository
> tables
>
>
>
> I’m guessing I should just increase the metadata minor version (from 3 to
> 4) and leave the major version (2) as-is. Does that sound right to you?
>
>
>
> Dave
>



-- 
Regards, --Qifan

Reply via email to