On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 2:07 AM Justin Mclean <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > > 1. in NOTICE there is a sentence that mentions that this content was > > originally developed by you. Is that legally required to be there? > > It’s required by ASF policy yes. The original copyright notices were > replaces with ASF ones and in that case you need to add the copyright to > NOTICE. [1] (also [2] where it mentions relocated copyrights) > I read this different. In your link [1] it says: "If the source file is submitted with a copyright notice included in it, the copyright owner (or owner's agent) must either: a) remove such notices, or b) move them to the NOTICE file associated with each applicable project release, or c) provide written permission for the ASF to make such removal or relocation of the notices." So if you had chosen to do so you could have just removed the copyright notice. > 2. At the bottom of the License file, there is a section that this project > > contains parts of the reveal.js framework which is licensed under the MIT > > license. Should that not be in the Notice file? > > License stuff goes in LICENSE not in NOTICE. [2] > > > In the docs I found the following two sentences, which have me confused > :) > > "LICENSE should contain the text of the ALv2 -- no more, no less." [2] > > That for the case where you have no 3rd party bundled item inside, unlike > this release. > > > "The LICENSE file communicates the licensing of all content in an Apache > > product distribution. It always contains the text of the Apache License, > > and sometimes more." [3] > > Thats for the case where we have 3rd part dependancies, like this release > does. > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers > 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice > >
